Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Hydrobiological Journal
Главный редактор: S. A. Afanasyev (open in a new tab)
Заместитель главного редактора: V.I. Yurishinets (open in a new tab)
Ответственный секретарь редакционной коллегии: L.I. Kalinina (open in a new tab)

Выходит 6 номеров в год

ISSN Печать: 0018-8166

ISSN Онлайн: 1943-5991

SJR: 0.221 SNIP: 0.469 CiteScore™:: 0.9 H-Index: 12

Indexed in

Water Quality Assessment of Some Right-bank Tributaries of the Volga River (the Cheboksary Reservoir Catchment) using Phyutoplankton Functional Classification

Том 56, Выпуск 2, 2020, pp. 50-62
DOI: 10.1615/HydrobJ.v56.i2.50
Get accessGet access

Краткое описание

Water quality assessment of the right-bank tributaries of the Cheboksary Reservoir (Kudma and Sundovik) using the phytoplankton functional group method and calculated on its basis community index Q, showed predominance in the Kudma River indicators of eutrophication and water pollution by the organic substances (codons D and W1). The main functional groups in the potamoplankton of the shorter river (Sundovik) were codons D and TB, which comprised the planktonic diatoms randomly entering the water column from benthic communities. The use of different approaches in the water quality assessment has demonstrated higher sensitivity of the community index Q and ecological quality ratio EQR as compared with the saprobiological analysis.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА
  1. Vodeneyeva, Ye.L. 2006. Sostav i struktura fitoplanktona gumozno-atsidnykh vodoyomov (na primere vodnykh obyektov zapovednika "Kerzhenskiy"). (Phytoplankton composition and structure in humicacid water bodies (by example of the water bodies of the "Kerzhenskiy" reserve.) Autror's abstract of PhD these. Nizhniy Novgorod. 15 pp. [Rus.].

  2. Kachestvo poverkhnostnykh vod Rosiyskoy Federatsii. Yezhegodnik 2011. 2012. (Quality of the surface waters of Russian Federation. A yearbook 2011.) Rostov na Donu. 553 pp. [Rus.].

  3. Kachestvo poverkhnostnykh vod Rosiyskoy Federatsii. Yezhegodnik 2014. 2015. (Quality of the surface waters of Russian Federation. A yearbook 2014.) Rostov na Donu. 550 pp. [Rus.].

  4. Korneva, L.G. & V.V. Soloviyova. 2012. Practice of use of the morpho-functional classification of the freshwater algae for assessment of dynamics and spatial distribution of phyto-plankton of the Rybinsk reservoir. Yaroslav. ped. vestnik 3(3): 110-114. [Rus.].

  5. Metodika izucheniya biogeocenosov vnutrennikh vodoyemov. 1975. (Methods of studies of biogeocenoses of the continental water bodies.) Moscow, Nauka Press. 240 pp. [Rus.].

  6. Oksiyuk, O.P., V.N. Zhukinskiy, L.P. Braginskiy et al. 1993. Integral ecological classification of the surface waters quality. Gidrobiol. zhurn 29(4): 62-72. [Rus.].

  7. Okhapkin, A.G. 1998. Phytoplankton species composition as index of habitat conditions in the water courses of different type. Botan. zhurn. 83(9): 8-9.

  8. Okhapkin, A.G. 1997. Struktura i suktsessiya fitoplanktonapri zaregulirovanii rechnogo stoka (naprimere Volgi iyeyopritokov). (Phytoplankton structure and succession over the river regulation (be example of the Volga River and its tributaries.)) Author's abstract of Dr of Sci thesis. St Petersburg. 45 pp. [Rus.].

  9. Okhapkin, A.G., N.V. Andriyanova, V.A. Maximova et al. 2015. Dynamics ofhydrochemical composition of the lower section of the Oka River. Voda: khimiya i ekologiya 5: 15-21.

  10. Okhapkin, A.G., Ye.L. Vodeneyeva & O.O. Bondarev. 2015. Species composition of plank- tonic blue-green algae of the Cheboksary reservoir. Algologiya 25(3): 265-277. [Rus.].

  11. Okhapkin, A.G., Ye.M. Sharagina & O.O. Bondarev. 2013. Phytoplankton of the Cheboksary reservoir at modern stage of its existence. Povolzhskiy ekol. zhurn. 2: 190-199. [Rus.].

  12. Priroda Gorkovskoy oblasti. 1974. (Nature of the Gorkiy oblast'). Gorkiy, Volgo-Viatskoye Press. 179 pp. [Rus.].

  13. Semenchenko, V.P. & V.I. Razlutskiy. 2011. Ekologicheskoye kachestvo poverkhnostnykh vod. (Enironmental quality of the surface waters.) Minsk, Belaruskaya Navuka Press. 329 pp. [Rus.].

  14. Startseva, N.A. 2002. Sostav i struktura fitoplanktona malykh vodoyomov urbanizirovannogo landshafta (naprimereg. Nizhnego Novgoroda). (Phytoplankton composition and structure in the small water bodies of the urbanized landscape (by example of the Nizhniy Novgorod.)) Author's abstract of PhD thesis. Nizhniy Novgorod. 17 pp. [Rus.].

  15. Unifitsirovanniye metody issledovaniya kachestva vod. Atlas saprobnykh organizmov. 1976. (Standardized methods of the water quality analysis. Atlas of saprobic organisms.) Moscow, CMEA. 227 pp. [Rus.].

  16. Unifitsirovanniye metody issledovaniya kachestva vod. Metody biologicheskogo analisa vod. Ch. 3. 1977. (Standardized methods of the water quality analysis. Methods of biological analysis of water. Part 1.) Moscow, CMEA Secretariat. 175 pp. [Rus.].

  17. Shitikov, V.K., G.S. Rozenberg & T.D. Zinchenko. 2003. Kolichestvennaya gidroekologiya: Metody sistemnoy identifikatsii. (Quantitative hydroecology: Methods of system identification.) Tolyatti. 463 pp. [Rus.].

  18. Ekologicheskiy monitoring. Metody biomonitoringa.1995. (Environmental monitoring. Bio-monitoring methods.) Nizhniy Novgorod, Publ. House of Nizhniy Novgorod University. 192 pp. [Rus.].

  19. Abonyi, A., M. Leitao, I. Stankovic et al. 2014. A large river (River Loire, France) survey to compare phytoplankton functional approaches: do they display river zones in similar ways? Ecol. indicators 46: 11-22.

  20. Babanazarova O.V. & O.A. Lyashenko. 2007. Inferring long-term changes in the physical-chemical environment of the shallow, enriched Lake Nero from statistical and functional analyses of its phytoplankton. J. Plankton Res. 29(9): 747-756.

  21. Borics, G., V. Garbiro, I. Grigorszky et al. 2007. A new evaluation technique of potamo-plankton for the assessment of the ecological status of rivers. Arch. Hydrobiol. 161 (3-4): 465-486.

  22. Celik, K. & T. Ongun Sevindik. 2015. The phytoplankton functional group concept provides a reliable basis for ecological status estimation in the ?aygoren Reservoir (Turkey). Turkish J. Botany 39(4): 588-598.

  23. Cellamare, M., S. Morin, M. Michel Coste & J. Haury. 2012. Ecological assessment of French Atlantic lakes based on phytoplankton, phytobenthos and macrophytes. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184: 4685-4708.

  24. Chen, N., H. Liu, Y. Li et al. 2015. Morphology-based classification of functional groups for potamoplankton. J. Limnol. 74(3): 559-571.

  25. Directive 2000/60/EC ofthe European Parlament and of the Council of 23 October 2000. Off. J. Europ. Com. L 327. 72 pp.

  26. El-Karim, M. 2015. Survey to compare phytoplankton functional approaches: how can these approaches assess river Nile water quality in Egypt? Egyptian J. Aquatic Res. 41: 247-55.

  27. Jarvinen, M., S. Drakare, G. Free et al. 2012. Phytoplankton indicator taxa for reference conditions in Northern and Central European lowland lakes. Hydrobiologia 704: 97-113.

  28. Kruk, C., H.M. Peeters, E. VanNes et al. 2010. A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton. Freshwater Biol. 55: 614-627.

  29. Noges, P., U. Mischke, R. Laugaste, A.G. Solimini. 2010. Analysis of changes over 44 years in the phytoplankton of Lake Vortsjarv (Estonia): the effect of nutrients, climate and the investigator on phytoplankton-based water quality indices. Hydrobiologia 646: 33-48.

  30. Padisak, J., G. Borics, I. Grigorszky et al. 2006. Use ofphytoplankton assemblages formonitoring ecological status of lakes within the Water Framework Directive: the assemblages index. Ibid. 553: 1-14.

  31. Padisak, J., L. Crossetti & L. Naselli-Flores. 2009. Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification: a critical review with updates. Ibid. 621: 1-19.

  32. Pantle, R. & H. Buck. 1955. Die biologische Uberwachung der Gewasser und Darstellung der Ergebnisse. Gas und Wasserfach. 96(18): S. 1-604. [Germ.].

  33. Piirsoo, K., P. Pall, A. Tuvikene et al. 2010. Assessment of water quality in a large lowland river (Narva, Estonia / Russia) using a new Hungarian potamoplanktic method. Estonian J. Ecol. 59(4): 243-258.

  34. Reynolds, C.S., V. Huszar, C. Kruk et al. 2002. Towards a functional classification of the fresh-water phytoplankton. J. Plankton Res. 24(5): 417-428.

  35. Reynolds, C.S. & A.E. Irish. 1997. Modelling phytoplankton dynamics in lakes and reservoirs: the problem of in-situ growth rates. Hydrobiologia: 5-17.

  36. Salmaso, N. & J. Padisak. 2007. Morpho-functional groups and phytoplankton development in two deep lakes (Lake Garda, Italy and Lake Stechlin, Germany). Ibid. 578: 97-112.

  37. Sladecek, V.A. 1963. A guide to limnosaprobical organisms. Sb. Vysoke skoly Chem.-Technol. v Praze. Technologie vody 7(2): 543-612.

  38. Wegl, R. 1983. Index fur die Limnosaprobitat. Wasser und Abwasser 26: 1-175. [Germ.].

  39. Zelinka, M. & P. Marvan. 1968. Beverkungen zu neuen Methoden der saprobiologischen Wasserbeurteilung. Verh. Intern. Vereinig. Limnol. 16: 817-822. [Germ.].

Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции Цены и условия подписки Begell House Контакты Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain