Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences
SJR: 0.275 SNIP: 0.59 CiteScore™: 0.8

ISSN Печать: 1064-2315
ISSN Онлайн: 2163-9337

Выпуски:
Том 52, 2020 Том 51, 2019 Том 50, 2018 Том 49, 2017 Том 48, 2016 Том 47, 2015 Том 46, 2014 Том 45, 2013 Том 44, 2012 Том 43, 2011 Том 42, 2010 Том 41, 2009 Том 40, 2008 Том 39, 2007 Том 38, 2006 Том 37, 2005 Том 36, 2004 Том 35, 2003 Том 34, 2002 Том 33, 2001 Том 32, 2000 Том 31, 1999 Том 30, 1998 Том 29, 1997 Том 28, 1996

Journal of Automation and Information Sciences

DOI: 10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v51.i1.10
pages 1-14

Bayesian Strategy for Group Decision Making and its Interval Generalization

Olga A. Zhukovskaya
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kiev Polytechnic Institute", Kiev
Leonid S. Fainzilberg
International Research and Training Center of Information Technologies and Systems of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv

Краткое описание

An original approach to formalize the process of group decision making based on integration of private decisions of independent experts is developed. Mathematical models of collective decisions under risk conditions based on Bayesian strategy are proposed. Using the interval analysis methods there are constructed the suboptimal models providing with a given confidence probability the average risk minimum of the group decision on a set of possible situations.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

  1. Vozhakov A.V., Gitman M.B., Stolbov V.Yu., Eliseev A.S., Algorithm for group decision making within the framework of situational center of industrial enterprise, Prikladnaya matematika i voprosy upravleniya, 2015, No. 2, 63–74.

  2. Lu J., Zhang G., Ruan Da, Wu Fengjie, Multi-objective group decision making. Methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques, Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Imperial College Press, London, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/p505

  3. Ho T.K., Hull J.J., Srihari S.N., Decision combination in multiple classifier systems, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1994, 16, No. 1, 66-75. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1109/34.273716

  4. Kittler J., Roli F., (Eds.), Multiple classifier systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2000, No. 1857.

  5. Ryazanov V.V., Tkachev Yu.I., Dependency recovery based on Bayesian correction of a group of recognition algorithms, Zhurnal vychislitelnoy matematiki i matematicheskoy fiziki, 2010, 50, No. 9, 1687–1696.

  6. Fainzilberg L.S., The Bayes scheme of team decision making under contradiction conditions, Problemy upravleniys i informatiki, 2002, No. 3, 112–122.

  7. Zhukovskaya O.A., Fainzilberg L.S., Interval generalization of Bayesian model of group decision making in conflict situations, Kibernetika i sistemnyi analiz, 2005, No. 3, 133–144.

  8. Hinsz V.B., Nickell G.S., Positive reactions to working in groups in a study of group and individual goal decision-making, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2004, 8, No. 4, 253–264. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.8.4.253.

  9. Hsu C.C., Standford B.A., The Delphi Technique: Making sense of consensus, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2007, 12, No. 10, 1–8.

  10. Yousuf M.I., Using experts’ opinions through Delphi Technique, Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 2007, 12, No. 4, 1–8.

  11. Sadi E.S., Computerized argument Delphi Technique, IEEE Journals & Magazines, 2015, 3, 368-380. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2424703

  12. Lu L., Yuan Y.C., McLeod P.L., Twenty-Five years of hidden profiles in group decision making a meta-analysis, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2012, 16, No. 1, 54-75. DOI: 10. 1177/1088868311417243

  13. Chen S.M. , Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2000. N 114. P. 1–9.

  14. Nasab F.G., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M., Extension of TOPSIS for group decision-making based on the type-2 fuzzy positive and negative ideal solutions, International Journal Industrial Mathematics, 2010, 2, No. 3, 199–213.

  15. Kovalenko I.I., Shved A.V., Expert technologies of decision making [in Russian], Ilion, Nikolaev, 2013.

  16. Zgurovsky M.Z., Totsenko V.G., Tsyganok V.V., Group incomplete paired comparisons with account of expert competence, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2004, 39, No. 4(5), 349– 361. DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7177(04)90511-0

  17. Totsenko V.G., Methods and systems of decision making support. Algorithmic aspect [in Russian], Naukova dumka, Kiev, 2002.

  18. Dijkstra J., Assen M.A., Stokman F.N., Outcomes of collective decisions with externalities predicted, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2008, No. 20, 415–442. DOI: 10.1177/0951629808093774

  19. Napel S., Widgran M., The possibility of a preference-based power index, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2005, 17, No. 3, 377–387.

  20. Suchan C., Heidhues P., A group bargaining solution, Mathematical Social Sciences, 2004, 48, No. 1, 37–53.

  21. Mashchenko S.O., Individually optimal equilibria of noncooperative games in preference relationships, Kibernetika i sistemnyi analiz, 2009, No. 1, 171–179.

  22. Zaychenko Yu.P., Fuzzy models and methods in intellectual systems [in Russian], Slovo, Kiev, 2008.

  23. Ashtiani B., Haghighirad F., Montazer G.A., Extension of fuzzy topsis method based on intervalvalued fuzzy sets, Applied Soft Computing, 2009, No. 9, 457–461. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2008.05.005

  24. Boran F.E., Gen S., Kurt M., Akay D., A Multi-criteria Intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert System with Application, 2009, 36, No. 8, 11363-11368. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4400-0

  25. Chen S.M., Lee L.W., Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with applications, 2010, No. 37, 824–833.

  26. Grzegorzewski P., Distances between Intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric, Fuzzy Set and Systems, 2004, No. 148, 319-328. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.fss.2003.08.005

  27. Hong D.H., Lee S., Some algebraic properties and a distance measure for interval-valued fuzzy numbers, Information Sciences, 2002, No. 148, 1-10.

  28. Zanakis S.H., Solomon A., Wishart N., Dublish D., Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation of select methods, European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 107, No. 3, 507–529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1

  29. Lima Junior F.R., Osiro L., Carpinettia L.C.R., A Comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection applied, Soft Computing, 2014, No. 21, 194–209. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014

  30. Asan G., Sanver R., Another characterization of the majority rule, Economics Letters, 2002, 75, No. 3, 409-413.

  31. Brams S., Fishburn P., Voting procedures, In handbook of social choice and welfare, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002, 173-236.

  32. Conitzer V., Sandholm T., Common voting rules as maximum likelihood estimators, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-05), 2005, 145-152.

  33. Dowding K., Van Hees M., In praise of manipulation, British Journal of Political Science, 2007, 38, No. 1, 1–15. DOI: 10.1017/S000712340800001X

  34. Saari D., Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes: II. Positional voting, Economic Theory, 2000, 15, No. 1, 55-102.

  35. Arrow K.J., Collective choice and individual values [Russian translation], Gu VShE, Moscow, 2004.

  36. Gorban I.I., Probability theory and mathematical statistics for researchers and engineers [in Ukrainian], IPMMS NAN Ukrainy, Kyiv, 2003.

  37. Zhukovska O.A., Foundation of interval analysis [in Ukrainian], Osvita Ukrainy, Kyiv, 2009.

  38. Zhukovska O.A., Fainzilberg L.S., Mathematical models of group decision making [in Ukrainian], Osvita Ukrainy, Kyiv, 2018.


Articles with similar content:

Clustering of Composite Fuzzy Numbers Aggregate Based on Sets of Scalar and Vector Levels
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.50, 2018, issue 10
Evgeniy V. Ivokhin , Dmitriy V. Apanasenko
Algorithms with Limited Parallelism for Solving One Digital Filtering Problem
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.33, 2001, issue 10
Mikhail S. Jadzhak
The Inductive Approach in Mathematics
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.34, 2002, issue 4
Alexandra A. Vagis
APPLICATION OF BAYESIAN FORMALISM TO IDENTIFICATION OF LOGICAL-AND-PROBABILISTIC MODELS FOR ESTIMATING THE LEVEL OF INFORMATION SECURITY OF MODERN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
Telecommunications and Radio Engineering, Vol.69, 2010, issue 19
A. N. Nazarov
AN APPROACH TO PREDICTION OF THE TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK QUALITY PARAMETERS UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF NON-STOCHASTIC UNCERTAINTY
Telecommunications and Radio Engineering, Vol.76, 2017, issue 11
N. О. Korolyuk