Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
SJR: 0.145 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN Печать: 1050-6934
ISSN Онлайн: 1940-4379

Выпуски:
Том 30, 2020 Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v18.i1.10
3 pages

Abstracts for the Fifth International Conference: Ethical Issues in Biomedical Engineering, April 3-5, 2009:
Abstract of "Reflections on Morality, Ethics, and Bioethics Decisions"

George Bugliarello
Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Six MetroTech Center Brooklyn, NY 11201

Краткое описание

From the presumed biological evolutionary origins of a urmorality, there eventually developed a conscious set of morality concepts and rules that became less immediate and more abstract, and increasingly shaped by social factors. Today the concepts and precepts of morality have come to form a complex system in which each specialized professional ethics respond with a certain degree of latitude to conditions within its own domain. The raison d''etre of morality is the connection between actions and their possible outcomes, which embodies the concept of risk. The risk considerations underpinning an ethical decision can ultimately lead to better decisions. They can also lead to a better understanding of the evolutionary underpinnings and trajectory of our morality, from that of ancestral species to its present complex construct of ethics rules and beliefs. Determination of possible scenarios, their probabilities and their consequences, as an essential component of a rational assessment of risk, presents difficulties, especially in connection with a new process or a new technology. These inherent complexities in reaching and carrying out an ethical decision can be made more tractable by developing methodologies that can help to learn how to think about difficult issues. For example, a biosoma-environmental paradigm can help insure that in making ethics decisions all necessary components of a rational risk assessment are considered. Rationality, however, is not the only base for ethical decisions. Factors such as emotion, instinct, and tradition, specific to a situation, a societal group or subgroup, or to a profession, can exert a powerful influence on ethics decisions, especially in the realm of health and psychology. An understanding of the interplay between these factors and rational assessment of the risks should be at the base of any ethical decision.


Articles with similar content:

The Ethics of Technology and Innovation: Second Thoughts
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.9, 2018, issue 1
David W. Chambers
The significance of Fear as an "Equal Opportunity Component" in the Articulation & Acceptance of Informed Consent in Dentistry
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.3, 2012, issue 1-3
Boyd W. Shepherd
Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in Environmental Health Research
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.1, 2010, issue 4
David B. Resnik
What Does It Mean to Be Human? Humanness, Personhood and the Transhumanist Movement
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.1, 2010, issue 2
D. John Doyle
Reducing Workers' Compensation Costs for Latex Allergy and Litigation against Glove Manufacturing Companies
Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, Vol.28, 2009, issue 4
Jill J. Dahlstrom, William B. Long III, Shelley S. Mason, Richard Edlich, Erin M. Swainston, K. Dean Gubler