SJR: 0.145 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89
ISSN Печать: 1050-6934
Выпуски:Том 30, 2020 Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
Abstract of "Ethics of Censorship in Science and Technology Policy"
Senior Research Professor of Homeland Security, National Defense University/ IRMC, Fort Lesley McNair Washington, DC 20319
This presentation relates to the IEEE EMBS Government Affairs column of May/June 2008 entitled: Professional Responsibility: politics, culture, and religion versus science and technology. Who defines our respective personal ethics and morality when it comes to informing the public? What is our collective code of ethics and morality when it comes to informing the public and seeing to it that they receive factual, timely, and necessary information responsibly? Who should determine such a code? Should this be our respective community leadership, governments, professional societies, or groups? Should we (EMBS or IEEE) have a voice of our own? I believe that our profession is capable of providing a much needed, professional and balanced perspective. Through the ages, society's perceptions of contributions by science and scientists have also changed. In spite of significant advances, much remains to be done. In the past, many scientists paid with their lives for claiming ideas that went against the central authority of the Church. Today, professional organizations still fear addressing topics that are not popular among all of its membership. Governments, on the other hand, may censure scientific thought if the scientific conclusions are not aligned with their mainstream political agendas. In either case, the general public may not receive the benefit of a total scientific or technological education that they deserve from us. The question is then: What are we supposed to do? How are we supposed to advance our careers for the benefit of mankind? How do we educate the human race? Perhaps, despite these differences (political, religious, cultural, etc.), we could strive, using our professional organization, to provide the global public a more sensible and accurate perspective of the impact of science and technology in their lives.
Articles with similar content:
Should Logic Trump Intuition in Bioethical Discourse? Contrasting Peter Singer and Leon Kass
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.2, 2011, issue 1
D. John Doyle
Moving Ethics Curricula Forward
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.2, 2011, issue 2
Charles N. Bertolami
Maternity at Advanced Ages. Ethical Concerns Related to the Assisted Reproductive Technology from a Scientific and Religious Perspective
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.3, 2012, issue 1-3
Community Engagement in Observational Human Exposure Studies
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.1, 2010, issue 4
Peter P. Egeghy, Davyda M. Hammond, Roy C. Fortmann
Abstract of "Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Neurotechnology Research: Confronting the Boundaries and Considering the Implications"
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.18, 2008, issue 1
Dennis K. McBride
|Портал||Begell Электронная Бибилиотека||e-Книги||Журналы||Справочники и Сборники статей||Коллекции|