Доступ предоставлен для: Guest
Портал Begell Электронная Бибилиотека e-Книги Журналы Справочники и Сборники статей Коллекции
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
SJR: 0.145 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN Печать: 1050-6934
ISSN Онлайн: 1940-4379

Выпуски:
Том 30, 2020 Том 29, 2019 Том 28, 2018 Том 27, 2017 Том 26, 2016 Том 25, 2015 Том 24, 2014 Том 23, 2013 Том 22, 2012 Том 21, 2011 Том 20, 2010 Том 19, 2009 Том 18, 2008 Том 17, 2007 Том 16, 2006 Том 15, 2005 Том 14, 2004 Том 13, 2003 Том 12, 2002 Том 11, 2001 Том 10, 2000

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v18.i1.70
9 pages

Abstract of "Ethical Challenges in Nanotechnology"

Malay Kumar Banerjee
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur, Howrah 711 103 India

Краткое описание

The hidden potential in nanotechnology to cause a paradigm shift in the quality of human lives is already identified. Needless to say that, as in any other technology, nanotechnology is also not void of risk. The excitement in technology discovery quite often delays the process of risk assessment of the concerned technology. While people think of the new form of lives in the nanoregime, it becomes of paramount importance to adequately address the issues of boundary conditions that define the domain that the discoverable technology should be given to dwell within. Unless the intellectualism of human beings is integrated aright with nature's wisdom, the very purpose of the discovery gets defeated. The greatest challenge before the scientist and technologist is to secure the power of balance—that is, the ability to define dos and don'ts. Taking resort to nanobiotechnology for health care and food security by way of gene therapy or genetic modification of food items is not yet time tested and hence the risk of genetic pollution deserves special attention. When the distant genetic barrier is overcome through artificial mutations, the interaction of the new form of organic material, thus produced, with its surrounding environment is required to be appropriately understood in order that the disastrous consequences can be avoided. Equally important, the invisible nanoparticles can bring about immense environment hazards. The present deliberation attempts to analyze the situation on the basis of social ethics and not on the basis of the poorly defined term "morality." The ethical responsibilities of both the technology developers and the technology recipients have been tried to be identified on a futuristic basis. The role of political advocacy in this regard in a country and its compatibility with those of other countries are also highlighted.


Articles with similar content:

Nanotechnology in Biology: Understanding Future Ethical Dilemmas from Past Technologies
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.1, 2010, issue 4
Juliana Marchesano, Sara Brenner
Should Researchers Always Be Required to Report Suspected Child Maltreatment?
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.4, 2013, issue 4
Vincent J. Palusci
Cutting Eugenics Out of CRISPR-Cas9
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.6, 2015, issue 3-4
Marya Pollack, Robert Pollack, Carolyn Brokowski
Beyond a Code of Ethics for Bioengineers: The Role of Ethics in an Integrated Compliance Program
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.28, 2000, issue 3&4
Jan C. Heller
Biomedical Ethics and Legal Perspectives
Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal, Vol.5, 2014, issue 1
Bishnanand Dubey, Durg Vijay Rai, Bijayesh Haldar