Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research
ESCI SJR: 0.206 SNIP: 0.446 CiteScore™: 0.5

ISSN Imprimir: 2152-5102
ISSN On-line: 2152-5110

Volumes:
Volume 46, 2019 Volume 45, 2018 Volume 44, 2017 Volume 43, 2016 Volume 42, 2015 Volume 41, 2014 Volume 40, 2013 Volume 39, 2012 Volume 38, 2011 Volume 37, 2010 Volume 36, 2009 Volume 35, 2008 Volume 34, 2007 Volume 33, 2006 Volume 32, 2005 Volume 31, 2004 Volume 30, 2003 Volume 29, 2002 Volume 28, 2001 Volume 27, 2000 Volume 26, 1999 Volume 25, 1998 Volume 24, 1997 Volume 23, 1996 Volume 22, 1995

International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research

DOI: 10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.v24.i4-6.350
pages 798-807

Two-Phase Flow Simulation of a Dump Combustor under Realistic Conditions

D. Bissieres
Aerospatiale Missiles, Les Gatines, 91370 Verrières le Buisson, France
G. Lavergne
Heterogeneous, Multiphase Flows Unit, Aerodynamic and Energetic Models Department, Office National d'Etudes et de la Recherche Aérospatiales (ONERA), 31055 Toulouse Cedex 4, France

RESUMO

This paper presents some results on the numerical simulation of the two-phase flow in a dump combustor, under realistic conditions. This study has been performed with a two-phase flow code, which simulates the main physical phenomena occurring in a ramjet combustion chamber. Those models were validated on basic configurations. Interactions between the gas and liquid phases, called two-way coupling, are particularly studied in this paper. Two methods have been used to include two-way coupling in the simulations. First one is based on a global iterative scheme, the second one on an unsteady approach. The results obtained by the two methods are in a quite good agreement. The discrepancy appearing in the flow fields may be created by the aerodynamic flow field calculation, which may be erroneous in the outlet nozzle, due to problems to get the exit nozzle flow chocked. However, the significant interactions between the two phases, particularly near the walls, induce great computation times for the first method. Both methods will be used on other configurations, and a combustion model will be added to the numerical code, in order to compute combustion efficiency in such configurations.


Articles with similar content:

A Study of the Two-Way Coupling Modeling for the Two-Phase Flow Simulation in a Lean Premixer Prevaporizer Module
International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research, Vol.24, 1997, issue 4-6
D. Bissieres, G. Lavergne, P. Trichet
APPLICATION OF MULTI-PHYSICS MODELING IN ELECTRO-CHEMICAL MACHINING PROCESS FOR 3D COMPRESSOR BLADE
ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.13, 2008, issue
Ryo Tsuboi, Dai Kato, Makoto Yamamoto
CAVITATING BUBBLY FLOW COMPUTATIONS BY MEANS OF MIXTURE BALANCE EQUATIONS
3rd Thermal and Fluids Engineering Conference (TFEC), Vol.29, 2018, issue
Dia Zeidan, Lucy T. Zhang, Eric Goncalves
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MODELING AND NUMERICAL UNCERTAINTIES IN LARGE EDDY SIMULATION USING UPWIND-BIASED NUMERICAL SCHEMES
TSFP DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.5, 2007, issue
Martin Freitag, Johannes Janicka, Markus Klein
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TWO HEATED PARALLEL PLANE AIR JETS
ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.13, 2008, issue
Terfous Abdelali, Bentarzi Fatiha, Amina Mataoui