Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression
Fator do impacto: 2.156 FI de cinco anos: 2.255 SJR: 0.649 SNIP: 0.599 CiteScore™: 3

ISSN Imprimir: 1045-4403
ISSN On-line: 2162-6502

Volumes:
Volume 30, 2020 Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994

Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.v13.i24.70
14 pages

Gap-Junctional Regulation of Osteoclast Function

Joanna Ilvesaro
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Juha Tuukkanen
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

RESUMO

Previous research has shown that bone-resorbing osteoclasts contain connexin molecules that organize to hemichannel-forming connexons, which in turn form functional gap junctions in neighboring cells. So far only little is known about the role of gap junctions in osteoclasts. However, blocking of the gap-junctional communication inhibits bone resorption in vitro. Knockout mice deficient of Connexin-43, the major connexin in bone cells, show surprisingly little skeletal manifestations. Gap-junctional communication in osteoblasts and osteocytes is well documented and seems to be essential for the integrity of bone cells, as well as for the transfer of mechanical signals of bone loading. The role of gap junction in osteoclasts is unclear, so far, but some putative roles have been suggested, including their participation in osteoclast precursor fusion to multinucleated mature osteoclasts, communication in the bone multicellular unit in bone remodeling, osteoclast survival, and apoptosis.


Articles with similar content:

Immune Defects in Fanconi Anemia
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.26, 2006, issue 1
Grover C. Bagby, Sara R. Fagerlie
Interleukins in the Control of Osteoclast Differentiation
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.8, 1998, issue 2
M. T. Gillespie, E. Romas, T. John Martin
Multinucleated Osteoclast Formation In Vivo and In Vitro by P2X7 Receptor-Deficient Mice
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.13, 2003, issue 2-4
Robert A. Hipskind, James A. Gallagher, G. Buell, Katherine A. Buckley, Wayne B. Bowler, Alison Gartland, I. Chessell, J. H. Tobias, M. J. Perry
Osteopoiesis: The Early Development of Bone Cells
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.10, 2000, issue 3&4
Michael W. Long, Sujata Kale
Matrix Metalloproteinase Control of Capillary Morphogenesis
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.18, 2008, issue 3
Andrew Putnam, Steven C. George, Cyrus M. Ghajar