Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
Fator do impacto: 3.259 FI de cinco anos: 2.547 SJR: 0.417 SNIP: 0.8 CiteScore™: 1.52

ISSN Imprimir: 2152-5080
ISSN On-line: 2152-5099

Open Access

International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification

DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2015012623
pages 569-583

ROBUSTNESS OF WILKS' CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE OF CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Jan Peter Hessling
SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Measurement Technology, Box 857, SE-50115 Boras, Sweden
Jeffrey Uhlmann
University of Missouri−Columbia, Department of Computer Science, 201 EBW, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA

RESUMO

The striking generality and simplicity of Wilks' method has made it popular for quantifying modeling uncertainty. A conservative estimate of the confidence interval is obtained from a very limited set of randomly drawn model sample values, with probability set by the assigned so-called stability. In contrast, the reproducibility of the estimated limits, or robustness, is beyond our control as it is strongly dependent on the probability distribution of model results. The inherent combination of random sampling and faithful estimation in Wilks' approach is here shown to often result in poor robustness. The estimated confidence interval is consequently not a well-defined measure of modeling uncertainty. To remedy this deficiency, adjustments of Wilks' approach as well as alternative novel, effective but less known approaches based on deterministic sampling are suggested. For illustration, the robustness of Wilks' estimate for uniform and normal model distributions are compared.


Articles with similar content:

POLYNOMIAL-CHAOS-BASED KRIGING
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.5, 2015, issue 2
Joe Wiart, Bruno Sudret, Roland Schobi
AN EFFICIENT NUMERICAL METHOD FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN CARDIOLOGY MODELS
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.9, 2019, issue 3
Zhiwen Zhang, Xindan Gao, Wenjun Ying
Method for Selection and Substantiation of Base Models for Uniform Radioelectronic Means in the Interests of Technical Level Estimation
Telecommunications and Radio Engineering, Vol.64, 2005, issue 7-12
G. S. Gulyayev, L. A. Goncharenko
A NEW SEMIANALYTICAL PRESSURE TRANSIENT MODEL TO INTERPRET WELL TEST DATA IN RESERVOIRS WITH LIMITED EXTENT BARRIERS
Journal of Porous Media, Vol.21, 2018, issue 11
Meisam Adibifard, Mohammad Sharifi
RANDOM PREDICTOR MODELS FOR RIGOROUS UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.5, 2015, issue 5
Daniel P. Giesy, Sean P. Kenny, Luis G. Crespo