Inscrição na biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digital Begell Biblioteca digital da Begell eBooks Diários Referências e Anais Coleções de pesquisa
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
SJR: 0.145 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN Imprimir: 1050-6934
ISSN On-line: 1940-4379

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020035290
pages 61-67

Effect of Cement Type and Cementation Technique on the Retention of Implant-Supported Restorations

Zohre Zeinabadi
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Majedeh Nami
Postgraduate Student of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Majid Naserkhaki
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Sara Tavakolizadeh
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

RESUMO

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effect of cement type and cementation technique on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
Material and Methods: In this in vitro study, 20 solid abutments were screwed onto the fixture analogs and were mounted in acrylic resin molds using a surveyor. Twenty computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) metal crowns with an occlusal loop were fabricated, divided into two groups (n = 10), and bonded with temporary dental cement (Temp-Bond; group 1) or glass ionomer (GC; group 2). Each group was subcategorized based on its cementation method (half-filling or abutment replica technique). The cement was applied to the copings that were placed vertically on the abutment with applying a 5-kg load for 10 min. The samples were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h and subjected to 3000 thermal cycles. The samples underwent axial tensile load within a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA.
Results: GC cement yielded significantly higher retention than Temp-Bond (P < 0.05). In the GC group, the half-filling subgroup showed significantly higher retention than the abutment replica subgroup (P < 0.05). The mean retention value in the Temp-Bond group revealed no significant difference between the two subgroups (P > 0.05). GC yielded higher retention than Temp-Bond while using the half-filling cementation technique (P = 0.00). However, this difference was not significant between GC and Temp-Bond with the abutment replica technique (P = 0.960).
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the results showed that permanent cementation with half-filling technique yielded significantly higher retention in implant restorations.

Referências

  1. Quirynen M, Herrera D, Teughels W, Sanz M. Implant therapy: 40 years of experience. Periodontal 2000. 2014;66(1):7-12. .

  2. Canullo L, Cocchetto R, Marinotti F, Oltra DP, Diago MP, Loi I. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(12):1492-9. .

  3. Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(2):119-30. .

  4. Gomez-Polo M, Ortega R, Gomez-Polo C, Celemin A, Del Rio Highsmith J. Factors affecting the decision to use cemented or screw-retained fixed implant-supported prostheses: A critical review. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(1):43-54. .

  5. Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw-versus cement-retained implant restorations: Current concepts. Implant Dent. 2010;19(1):8-15. .

  6. Wittneben JG, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical performance of screw-versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions-a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;(29 Suppl):84-98. .

  7. Saber FS, Abolfazli N, Nuroloyuni S, Khodabakhsh S, Bahrami M, Nahidi R, Zeighami S. Effect of abutment height on retention of single cement-retained, wide- and narrow-platform implant-supported restorations. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012;6(3):98-102. .

  8. Shadid R, Sadaqa N. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38(3):298-307. .

  9. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: Current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44-56. .

  10. Mehl C, Harder S, Wolfart M, Kern M, Wolfart S. Retriev-ability of implant-retained crowns following cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(12):1304-11. .

  11. Wittneben J-G, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical performance of screw-versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions-a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;(29 Suppl):84-98. .

  12. Esposito M, Bressan E, Grusovin MG, D'Avenia F, Neumann K, Sbricoli L, Luongo G. Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? One-year post-loading results from a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(1):57-72. .

  13. Raees T. Cementation of implant prosthesis: A review of techniques for controlling excess cement around implants. Acta Sci Dent Sci. 2019;3(5):146-8. .

  14. Wilson TG Jr. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: A prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol. 2009;80(9):1388-92. .

  15. Nissan J, Snir D, Rosner O, Kolerman R, Chaushu L, Chaushu G. Reliability of retrievable cemented implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(5): 587-91. .

  16. Millen C, Bragger U, Wittneben JG. Influence of prosthesis type and retention mechanism on complications with fixed implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review applying multivariate analyses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(1):110-24. .

  17. Abduo J, Lyons K. Rationale for the use of CAD/ CAM technology in implant prosthodontics. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:768121. .

  18. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, White JT. The effect of surface roughness of crown preparations on retention of cemented castings. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58(3):292-6. .

  19. GE K. Effect of surface treatments on implant crown re-tention. J Dent Sci. 2010;5:131-5. .

  20. Jorgensen KD. The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13(1):35-40. .

  21. Kaufman EG, Coelho DH, Colin L. Factors influencing the retention of cemented gold castings. J Prosthet Dent. 1961;11:487-502. .

  22. Lewinstein I, Block L, Lehr Z, Ormianer Z, Matalon S. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106(6):367-72. .

  23. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J. 2011;56(Suppl 1):97-106. .

  24. Carter GM, Hunter KM, Herbison P. Factors influencing the retention of cemented implant-supported crowns. N Z Dent J. 1997;93(412):36-8. .

  25. Abou-Obaid A, Al-Khudairy R. Effect of abutment height and cement thickness on the retention of cement-retained implant supported restorations. Adv Dent Oral Health. 2018; 9(4):00112-17. .

  26. Marin DOM, Leite ARP, Oliveira Junior NM, Paleari AG, Pero AC, Compagnoni MA. Retention force and wear characteristics of three attachment systems after dislodging cycles. Braz Dent J. 2018;29(6):576-82. .

  27. Saleh M, Tasar-Faruk S. Comparing the marginal leakage and retention of implant-supported restorations cemented by four different dental cements. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(6):1181-8. .

  28. Amorfini L, Storelli S, Mosca D, Scanferla M, Romeo E. Comparison of cemented vs. screw-retained, customized computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture zirconia abutments for esthetically located single-tooth implants: A 10-year randomized prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(4):359-66. .

  29. Safari S, Hosseini Ghavam F, Amini P, Yaghmaei K. Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/ CAM metal copings over short abutments. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10(1):1-7. .

  30. Farzin M, Torabi K, Ahangari AH, Derafshi R. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns. J Dent (Tehran). 2014;11(3):256-62. .

  31. Naumova EA, Roth F, Geis B, Baulig C, Arnold WH, Piwowarczyk A. Influence of luting materials on the retention of cemented implant-supported crowns: An in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2018;11(10):1853. .

  32. Patel B, Patel V, Ramesh TR, Soundharya A. Effect of modified cementation technique on marginal fit and apical spread of excess cement for implant restorations: An in vitro study. J Dent Res Rev. 2016;3(1):8-12. .

  33. Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, de Llanos-Lanchares H, Brizuela-Velasco A, Pines-Hueso J, Ellakuria-Echebarria J. Retention strength after compressive cyclic loading of five luting agents used in implant-supported prostheses. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2107027. .

  34. Saleh M, Faruk ST. Enhancing retrievability of cement retained implant supported restorations. EC Dent Sci. 2019;18(3):508-12. .

  35. Dudley JE, Richards LC, Abbott JR. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(4):332-9. .


Articles with similar content:

Effect of Bioactive Ceramic and Recombinant Human Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (rhTGF-beta) on Regeneration of Parietal Bone Defects in Rat
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.21, 2011, issue 1
Fariborz Nasseri, Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh, Gholam Ali Gholami
Large Diameter Total Hip Replacement for Acute Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.29, 2019, issue 1
James W. Pritchett
Histologic and Histomorphometric Assessment of Xenograft Bone Substitute versus Synthetic Nonceramic Hydroxyapatite for Canine Tooth-Socket Preservation
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.29, 2019, issue 4
Reza Amid, Narges Shojaei, Mohammad Reza Abrishami, Faezeh Faghihi, Mohammad Mehdi Dehghan, Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh, Zahra Sohrabi, Fatemeh Mashhadiabbas
Correlative Experimental Animal and Human Clinical Retrieval Evaluations of Hydroxyapatite (HA)-Coated and Non-Coated Implants in Orthopaedics and Dentistry
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.28, 2000, issue 3&4
David E. Steflik, Raymond Y. Whitehead, Michael D. Wilson, Carlos Jaramillo, Timothy R. Young, R. Scott Corpe
Practice-Based Clinical Evaluation of Dental Implants Placed with Immediate or Delayed Loading Protocols: One-Year Follow-Up
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.29, 2019, issue 2
Leonardo Rigoldi Bonjardim, Ernesto Byron Benalcazar Jalkh, Paulo Guilherme Coelho, Adolfo Coelho de Oliveira Lopes, Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek, Estevam Augusto Bonfante, Abbas Zahoui, Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho de Carvalho