ライブラリ登録: Guest
International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering

年間 6 号発行

ISSN 印刷: 1543-1649

ISSN オンライン: 1940-4352

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.4 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.3 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 2.2 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.00034 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.46 SJR: 0.333 SNIP: 0.606 CiteScore™:: 3.1 H-Index: 31

Indexed in

Numerical Methods for Reacting Gas Flow Simulations

巻 5, 発行 1, 2007, pp. 1-10
DOI: 10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v5.i1.10
Get accessGet access

要約

In this study, various numerical schemes for transient simulations of 2D laminar reacting gas flows, as typically found in chemical vapor deposition reactors, are proposed and compared. These systems are generally modeled by means of many stiffly coupled elementary gas phase reactions between a large number of reactants and intermediate species. The purpose of this study is to develop robust and efficient solvers for the stiff reaction system, where as a first approach the velocity and temperature fields are assumed to be given. In this paper, we mainly focus on the performance of different time integration methods and their properties to success-fully solve the transient problem. Besides stability, which is important due to the stiffness of the problem, the preservation of nonnegativity of the species is crucial. It appears that this latter condition on time integration methods is much more restrictive toward the time step than stability.

によって引用された
  1. van Veldhuizen S., Vuik C., Kleijn C.R., Comparison of ODE methods for laminar reacting gas flow simulations, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 24, 3, 2008. Crossref

  2. van Veldhuizen S., Vuik C., Kleijn C.R., On projected Newton–Krylov solvers for instationary laminar reacting gas flows, Journal of Computational Physics, 229, 5, 2010. Crossref

  3. Ferrara Carlo, Preda Marco, Cavallotti Carlo, On the streamer propagation in methane plasma discharges, Journal of Applied Physics, 112, 11, 2012. Crossref

  4. Havasi Ágnes, Kazemi Ehsan, On Richardson extrapolation for low-dissipation low-dispersion diagonally implicit Runge–Kutta schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 358, 2018. Crossref

  5. van Veldhuizen S., Vuik C., Kleijn C. R., On Numerical Issues in Time Accurate Laminar Reacting Gas Flow Solvers, in Advanced Computational Methods in Science and Engineering, 71, 2009. Crossref

Begell Digital Portal Begellデジタルライブラリー 電子書籍 ジャーナル 参考文献と会報 リサーチ集 価格及び購読のポリシー Begell House 連絡先 Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain