ライブラリ登録: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begellデジタルライブラリー 電子書籍 ジャーナル 参考文献と会報 リサーチ集
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.243 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN 印刷: 0278-940X
ISSN オンライン: 1943-619X

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v28.i12.60
pages 23-32

The Biomechanical and Surgical Solutions for Patella Implant in Total Knee Arthroplasty

David G. Mendes
The Center for Implant Surgery, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Mazen Said
The Center for Implant Surgery, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Sorin Head
The Center for Implant Surgery, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Edmond Sabo
The Center for Implant Surgery, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Ricardo Nachman
The Center for Implant Surgery, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Jochanan H. Boss
The Center for Implant Surgery, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

要約

A basic fault in designs of patella implants that calls for a prompt remedy is the inadequate polyethylene thickness in contact areas. The requirement for thickness of patella implants should be similar to the requirement set up by the FDA in 1993 regarding the tibial implants, that is, a minimal thickness of 8 mm.
A solution is presented for the optimal design of the patella implant and for the appropriate surgical technique.
The implant's undersurface that fixes to bone is concave and has a 1-cm wide but 5 to 6 mm short central peg that does not risk the integrity of the bone. Fixation of the concave aspect to the convex aspect of the bony patella strongly enhances resistance to medio-lateral and supero-inferior shear forces.
The circumferential facet of the implant 8 mm thick assures uniform thickness of the entire implant and assures optimal mechanical properties of the polyethylene.
The articulating surface is tailored to conform to the corresponding femoral trochlear groove and condyles. It can be made to fit any femoral component of any knee implant.


Articles with similar content:

A 3-D FEM Analysis of Single and Multiple Screw-Root Dental Implant Fixed in a Mandible
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.28, 2000, issue 3&4
Amit Roychowdhury, S. Pal
Long-Term In Vivo Effect of Peg Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.22, 2012, issue 3
Brandon Engebretson, Vassilios I. Sikavitsas
Bone Ingrowths to Press-Fit and Loose-Fit Implants: Comparisons between Titanium and Hydroxyapatite
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.16, 2006, issue 2
Mikael Sundfeldt, Olav Reikeras, Carina B. Johansson
The Outcome and Complications of ACL Reconstruction Augmented with a Ligament Augmentation Device for a Follow-up Period of More Than Five years
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.10, 2000, issue 3
Ichiro Sekiya, Yusuke Sakaguchi, Haruyasu Yamamoto, Kenichi Shinomiya, Takeshi Muneta
Mechanisms of Stem Subsidence in Femoral Impaction Allografting
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.39, 2011, issue 6
Goran Fernlund, Hanspeter Frei, Carolyne Albert, Clive Duncan