年間 4 号発行
ISSN 印刷: 1050-6934
ISSN オンライン: 1940-4379
Indexed in
Programmatic Effectiveness of a University-Based Implant Training Program: Long-Term, Patient-Centered Outcomes
要約
The University of Kentucky College of Dentistry established a formal implant program in 1999. The program utilizes a single system (Straumann) and a team concept in which implants are placed by residents in period ontology or oral and maxillofacial surgery and restored by predoctoral dental students. The program features stringent patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, incremental structured learning experiences, formal standardized protocols, and hands-on preclinical learning experiences. The use of a single system simplified training protocols and inventory requirements. Complete and partially edentulous patients requiring single and multiple implants are eligible for the program, although maxillary anterior sites are excluded. There is a formal quality assurance program to assess patient-centered outcomes. The current report includes data for patients who had implants placed in the period from January 2000 through December 2002. During that period, 192 patients received dental implants, of which 116 patients (248 implants) were available for analysis. The mean follow-up was 7.05 years (median = 7.32 years). The implant survival rate was 98.4%, while the success rate was 93.15%. Success was determined by the absence of pain or mobility, as well as self-reported patient satisfaction with function, appearance, and surgical experience.
-
E. Jung Ronald, Zembic Anja, Pjetursson Bjarni E., Zwahlen Marcel, S. Thoma Daniel, Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years, Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23, 2012. Crossref
-
Pjetursson Bjarni E., Thoma Daniel, Jung Ronald, Zwahlen Marcel, Zembic Anja, A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years, Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23, 2012. Crossref
-
Mattheos N., Wismeijer D., Shapira L., Implant dentistry in postgraduate university education. Present conditions, potential, limitations and future trends, European Journal of Dental Education, 18, 2014. Crossref
-
Koole S., De Bruyn H., Contemporary undergraduate implant dentistry education: a systematic review, European Journal of Dental Education, 18, 2014. Crossref
-
Lee Damian J., Yuan Judy Chia-Chun, Hedger Philip J., Taylor Emily J., Harlow Rand F., Knoernschild Kent L., Campbell Stephen D., Sukotjo Cortino, Patient Perception and Satisfaction with Implant Therapy in a Predoctoral Implant Education Program: A Preliminary Study, Journal of Prosthodontics, 24, 7, 2015. Crossref
-
de Medeiros F.C.F.L., Kudo G.A.H., Leme B.G., Saraiva P.P., Verri F.R., Honório H.M., Pellizzer E.P., Santiago Junior J.F., Dental implants in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 47, 4, 2018. Crossref
-
Lang Lisa A., Hansen Sarah E., Olvera Norma, Teich Sorin, A comparison of implant complications and failures between the maxilla and the mandible, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 121, 4, 2019. Crossref
-
Al-Sabbagh Mohanad, Jenkins Diane W., de Leeuw Reny, Nihill Patricia, Robinson Fonda G., Thomas Mark V., Programmatic Assessment of a University-Based Implant Training Program Using Patient-Reported Outcomes, Journal of Dental Education, 78, 11, 2014. Crossref
-
Crisan Emil Lucian, Covaliu Bogdan Florin, Chis Diana Maria, A Systematic Literature Review of Quality Management Initiatives in Dental Clinics, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 21, 2021. Crossref