Library Subscription: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections
Atomization and Sprays
IF: 1.737 5-Year IF: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Print: 1044-5110
ISSN Online: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volume 30, 2020 Volume 29, 2019 Volume 28, 2018 Volume 27, 2017 Volume 26, 2016 Volume 25, 2015 Volume 24, 2014 Volume 23, 2013 Volume 22, 2012 Volume 21, 2011 Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v16.i5.60
pages 563-578

EFFECT OF A FIRE PLUME ON SUPPRESSION SPRAY DROPLET MOTION

John A. Schwille
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Richard M. Lueptow
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA

ABSTRACT

The effect of a fire on the droplets from suppression systems plays an important role in the physics of fire suppression. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) was used to measure the droplet velocities from two nozzles and afire sprinkler in the presence of fires ranging from 5 to 50 kW. Results show that the droplet velocity field is highly dependent on fire size, with droplets having generally slower downward velocities over large regions of the spray as the fire size increases. In some small regions, the fire plume results in a reversal of the droplet velocity, indicating that droplets are carried upward. For the 50-kW fire, the fire overwhelms the spray. Droplet trajectories, determined by tracking typical droplets' progression in the spray fields, show that droplets are blown sideways away from the fire plume. Droplet tracking also shows that droplet penetration into the fire plume decreases as fire size is increased. The penetration depends on the ratio of spray drag to plume momentum.


Articles with similar content:

EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AN INTERMITTENT GASOLINE SPRAY IMPINGING UNDER CROSS-FLOW CONDITIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.15, 2005, issue 2
Antonio L. N. Moreira, Miguel R. Oliveira Panão
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF NON-EVAPORATING SPRAY JET BY THE VORTEX METHOD
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 10
Tomomi Uchiyama
PULSED SPRAYS FROM OVERSIZED ORIFICES FOR INCREASED MOMENTUM AND KINETIC ENERGY IN DEPOSITING AGRICULTURAL SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.11, 2001, issue 6
M. Nilars, D. Ken Giles, P. G. Andersen
SPRAY IN CROSS FLOW OF A ROTARY ATOMIZER
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.22, 2012, issue 2
Han Jin Jeong, Andrew Corber, Sangsig Yun, Seong Man Choi
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS ON SECONDARY BREAKUP PROCESS OF METAL DROPLET IN GAS ATOMIZATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.29, 2019, issue 5
Jie Shen, Yao Ma, Haibo Sun, Xiangzhou Gao, Zhengqiu Li, Kaiping Du, Yu Hu