Library Subscription: Guest
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification

Published 6 issues per year

ISSN Print: 2152-5080

ISSN Online: 2152-5099

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.7 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.9 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 0.5 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.0007 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.5 SJR: 0.584 SNIP: 0.676 CiteScore™:: 3 H-Index: 25

Indexed in

ON THE ROLE OF DATA MINING TECHNIQUES IN UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION

Volume 2, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 73-94
DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.v2.i1.60
Get accessDownload

ABSTRACT

Techniques from scientific data mining are increasingly being used to analyze and understand data from scientific observations, simulations, and experiments. These methods provide scientists the opportunity to automate the tedious manual processing of the data, control complex systems, and gain insights into the phenomenon being modeled or observed. This process of data-driven scientific inference borrows ideas and solutions from a range of fields including machine learning, image and video processing, statistics, high-performance computing, and pattern recognition. The tasks involved in these analyses include the extraction of structures from the data, the identification of representative features for these structures, dimension reduction, and building predictive and descriptive models. At first glance, data mining and data-driven analysis may appear unrelated to stochastic modeling and uncertainty quantification. But, as we show in this paper, there are commonalities in the problems addressed and techniques used, providing the two communities the opportunity to benefit from the expertise and experiences of each other.

CITED BY
  1. Li Xiao-Teng, Chen Xiao-Song, Critical Behaviors and Finite-Size Scaling of Principal Fluctuation Modes in Complex Systems, Communications in Theoretical Physics, 66, 3, 2016. Crossref

  2. Liu Boyuan, Huang Shuangxi, Fan Wenhui, Xiao Tianyuan, Humann James, Lai Yuyang, Jin Yan, Data driven uncertainty evaluation for complex engineered system design, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 29, 5, 2016. Crossref

  3. Nemeth Martin, Michalconok German, Finding Relationships in Industrial Data with the Use of Hierarchical Clustering, in Software Engineering Trends and Techniques in Intelligent Systems, 575, 2017. Crossref

  4. Nemeth Martin, Michalconok German, Proposal of the Methodology for Identification of Repetitive Sequences in Big Data, in Software Engineering and Algorithms in Intelligent Systems, 763, 2019. Crossref

Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections Prices and Subscription Policies Begell House Contact Us Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain