Library Subscription: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell Digital Library eBooks Journals References & Proceedings Research Collections
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.207 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN Print: 0278-940X
ISSN Online: 1943-619X

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2015012287
pages 61-95

Microstimulation: Principles, Techniques, and Approaches to Somatosensory Neuroprosthesis

Mulugeta Semework
Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Dr., Unit 87, New York, NY, 10032

ABSTRACT

The power of movement of electrically charged particles has been used to alleviate an array of illnesses and help control some human body parts. Microstimulation, the electrical current−driven excitation of neural elements, is now being aimed at brain−machine interfaces (BMIs), brain-controlled external devices that improve quality of life for people such as those who have lost the ability to use their limbs. This effort is motivated by behavioral experiments that indicate a direct link between microstimulation-induced sensory experience and behavior, pointing to the possibility of optimizing and controlling the outputs of BMIs. Several laboratories have focused on using electrical stimulation to return somatosensory feedback from prosthetic limbs directly to the user's central nervous system. However, the difficulty of the problem has led to limited success thus far, and there is a need for a better understanding of the basic principles of neural microstimulation. This article provides a review of the available literature and some recent work at Downstate Medical Center and Columbia University on microstimulation of the primate and rodent somatosensory (S1) cortex and the ventral posterolateral thalamus. It is aimed at contributing to the existing knowledge base to generate good behavioral responses and effective, BMI-appropriate somatosensory feedback. In general, the threshold for the particular brain tissue in response to current−amplitude has to be determined by rigorous experimentation. For consistently reproducible results, hardware and thresholds for microstimulation have to be specified. In addition, effects on motor functions, including unwanted side effects in response to the microstimulation of brain tissue, must be examined to take the field from bench to bedside.


Articles with similar content:

Neuropharmacological Mechanisms of Drug Reward: Beyond Dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens
Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology, Vol.12, 1998, issue 1-2
Michael T. Bardo
RETHINKING HOW WE SUPPORT ONLINE LEARNING IN THE AGE OF ISOLATION AND INFORMATION ABUNDANCE: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CREATE SYSTEM
International Journal on Innovations in Online Education, Vol.1, 2017, issue 3
Marcela Borge
State of the Art and Future Challenges in Neural Engineering: Strategies for Nervous System Repair Foreword / Editors' Commentary (Volume 2)
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.39, 2011, issue 2
D. Kacy Cullen, Bryan J. Pfister
The Need for Population-Based Epidemiology Studies in the United States
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.12, 2002, issue 4
Joseph K. McLaughlin
A Functional Neuroanatomy of Anxiety and Fear: Implications for the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Anxiety Disorders
Critical Reviews™ in Neurobiology, Vol.10, 1996, issue 3-4
Ariel Deutch, Dennis S. Charney