Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Multiphase Science and Technology
SJR: 0.183 SNIP: 0.483 CiteScore™: 0.5

ISSN Imprimer: 0276-1459
ISSN En ligne: 1943-6181

Multiphase Science and Technology

DOI: 10.1615/MultScienTechn.v6.i1-4.300
pages 591-609

COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.2: OSCILLATING MANOMETER

Liu Jun
Concentration, Heat and Momentum Ltd.(CHAM), Bukey House, 40 High Street, Wimbledon Village, London, SW11 5AU, England
Dudley Brian Spalding
Concentration, Heat, and Momentum (CHAM), Limited, Bakery House, 40 High Street, Wimbledon Village, London SW19 5AU, England

RÉSUMÉ

The analytical solution for the oscillating manometer numerical benchmark test (V. H. Ransom, Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol. 3, pp.468−470, 1987) was compared with the predictions of five different computer codes. The results demonstrated consistently that implicit methods led to a numerical damping of the manometer oscillation whereas non-implicit formulations gave much better solutions.


Articles with similar content:

COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.1: FAUCET FLOW
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
H. Qin
COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 1.3: BOILING IN PIPE
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
Dudley Brian Spalding, H. Qin
COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.7: STRATIFIED FLOW
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
Z. Wu, Dudley Brian Spalding
COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.6: SHOCK-TUBE
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
D. Radosavjevic
COMPARISONS OF PREDICTIONS WITH NUMERICAL BENCHMARK TEST NO. 2.5: KELVIN-HELMHOLTZ INSTABILITY
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.6, 1992, issue 1-4
F. Villasenor, Dudley Brian Spalding