Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Heat Transfer Research
Facteur d'impact: 0.404 Facteur d'impact sur 5 ans: 0.8 SJR: 0.264 SNIP: 0.504 CiteScore™: 0.88

ISSN Imprimer: 1064-2285
ISSN En ligne: 2162-6561

Volumes:
Volume 51, 2020 Volume 50, 2019 Volume 49, 2018 Volume 48, 2017 Volume 47, 2016 Volume 46, 2015 Volume 45, 2014 Volume 44, 2013 Volume 43, 2012 Volume 42, 2011 Volume 41, 2010 Volume 40, 2009 Volume 39, 2008 Volume 38, 2007 Volume 37, 2006 Volume 36, 2005 Volume 35, 2004 Volume 34, 2003 Volume 33, 2002 Volume 32, 2001 Volume 31, 2000 Volume 30, 1999 Volume 29, 1998 Volume 28, 1997

Heat Transfer Research

DOI: 10.1615/HeatTransRes.2012004228
pages 523-538

Experimental Investigation of Thermal Response on High-Vacuum-Multilayer-Insulation (HVMLI) Cryogenic Tank after Sudden, Catastrophic Loss of Insulation Vacuum (SCLIV)

Ming Zhu
Department of Mechanics & Power, Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 800,Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, PR China
C. Ding
Department of Mechanics & Power, Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 800,Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, PR China
R. S. Wang
Department of Mechanics & Power, Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 800,Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, PR China

RÉSUMÉ

This paper was to experimentally investigate the thermal response of high-vacuum-multilayer-insulation (HVMLI) cryogenic tank after sudden, catastrophic loss of insulation vacuum (SCLIV). The venting and no-venting experiments were conducted with the breakdown of the insulating vacuum with nitrogen. There was a great temperature gradient in the thickness direction of the MLI in both the venting and no-venting experiments. Temperature jump appeared on the external wall of the inner vessel after gas was introduced into the insulation vacuum jacket. Thermal stratification in liquid nitrogen (LN2) was serious with 25 K axial temperature difference in the no-venting experiment. The no-venting experiment included four stages. The fourth stage was the most dangerous and must be strictly avoided because the pressure of the tank full of superheated LN2 could surpass the safety pressure in a few minutes and the tank could blast at any moment.