Abonnement à la biblothèque: Guest
Portail numérique Bibliothèque numérique eBooks Revues Références et comptes rendus Collections
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
SJR: 0.145 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN Imprimer: 1050-6934
ISSN En ligne: 1940-4379

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2016017416
pages 245-251

Radiographic Evaluation of Bone-Level Implants with Wound Dehiscence between the First- and Second-Stage Surgeries

Sara Soheilifar
Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Mohsen Bidgoli
Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Erfan Abbasi Atibeh
Dental Implant Research Center, Department of Periodontology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Javad Faradmal
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

RÉSUMÉ

Background: One of the most common complications of implant surgery is wound dehiscence followed by exposure of the implant to the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to radiographically analyze crestal bone loss around bone-level implants with wound dehiscence between the first- and second-stage surgeries.
Methods: The records of 136 implants inserted during 2013−2014 were evaluated. Patients with no history of systemic disease, drug addiction, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy were selected. Forty-eight implants had cover screws with complete or partial exposure to the oral cavity after the suture removal and before the second surgery. Digital or normal radiographs were taken after the first and during the second surgery and the distance between the implant shoulder and proximal bone crest was measured on the radiographs by 3 calibrated blinded examiners using a digital caliper.
Results: The mean amounts of bone loss around the exposed and nonexposed implants were 0.46 ± 0.55 and 0.32 ± 0.46 mm, respectively, with no significant differences between the two groups.
Conclusion: Wound dehiscence between the first- and second-stage surgeries may increase crestal bone loss in some cases but can be reduced by professional follow-ups and antibacterial treatments.


Articles with similar content:

Immediate Nonfunctional Loading of a Single Implant in the Posterior Maxillary Area: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.28, 2018, issue 2
Amirhossein Nejat, Mehrdad Radvar, Mohammad Javad Zarrabi, Majid Reza Mokhtari, Farid Shiezadeh
Bioactive Glass S53P4 and Autograft Bone in Treatment of Depressed Tibial Plateau Fractures - A Prospective Randomized 11-year Follow-Up
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.21, 2011, issue 2
E. Gullichsen, I. Koski, J. Heikkila, K . Pernaa, K. Mattila, Nina Lindfors, A. J. Aho
Difficulty of Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Acetabular Fractures
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.29, 2019, issue 3
Sean A. Sutphen, Benjamin C. Taylor, Sanjay Mehta, Sean P. McGowan, Adam A. Madsen, Devon M. Myers, David Galos
High Insertion Torque and Peri-Implant Bone Loss: Is There a Relationship?
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.25, 2015, issue 3
Mohsen Bidgoli, Javad Faradmal, Sepideh Soheilifar, Sara Soheilifar
Practice-Based Clinical Evaluation of Dental Implants Placed with Immediate or Delayed Loading Protocols: One-Year Follow-Up
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.29, 2019, issue 2
Leonardo Rigoldi Bonjardim, Ernesto Byron Benalcazar Jalkh, Paulo Guilherme Coelho, Adolfo Coelho de Oliveira Lopes, Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek, Estevam Augusto Bonfante, Abbas Zahoui, Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho de Carvalho