Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Atomization and Sprays
Factor de Impacto: 1.737 Factor de Impacto de 5 años: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Imprimir: 1044-5110
ISSN En Línea: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volumen 30, 2020 Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v18.i1.20
pages 49-83

UNSTEADINESS IN EFFERVESCENT SPRAYS: A NEW EVALUATION METHOD AND THE INFLUENCE OF OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS

Jan Jedelsky
Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of the thermodynamics and environmental engineering, Technická 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic
Miroslav Jicha
Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of the thermodynamics and environmental engineering, Technická 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic

SINOPSIS

A new evaluation method of unsteadiness of the spray generated by an effervescent atomizer is presented. The method is based on measurements of pressure fluctuations in the atomizer mixing chamber. Measurements, made under different atomizer operational conditions, show that the spray unsteadiness depends mainly on gas-to-liquid ratio (GLR). Decrease in GLR causes the spray to become more unsteady. The relation between atomizer internal two-phase flow pattern and the spray unsteadiness is elucidated by visualization of the internal two-phase flow using a digital camera and the use of published two-phase flow maps. Findings of the new method are complemented and confronted with the results obtained by the use of the spray unsteadiness evaluation method of Edwars and Marx.


Articles with similar content:

EVALUATION OF PLAIN-JET AIR BLAST ATOMIZATION AND EVAPORATION OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS IN A SMALL GAS TURBINE ENGINE APPLICATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 8
Christopher D. Bolszo, Vincent G. McDonell
COMPARISON OF WATER-IN-OIL EMULSION ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS FOR LOW- AND HIGH-CAPACITY PRESSURE-SWIRL NOZZLES
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.21, 2011, issue 5
Christopher D. Bolszo, William A. Sirignano, Adrian A. Narvaez, Vincent G. McDonell, Derek Dunn-Rankin
EFFECT OF THE LIQUID INJECTION ANGLE ON THE ATOMIZATION OF LIQUID JETS IN SUBSONIC CROSSFLOWS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.24, 2014, issue 1
H. Almeida, J. M. M. Sousa, Mário Costa
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE MERGED ANGLE BY SPRAY INTERACTION FROM PRESSURE-SWIRL ATOMIZERS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.23, 2013, issue 4
Moongeun Hong, Soo Yong Lee, Youngsun Yi
MULTIPOINT STATISTICAL STRUCTURE OF THE IDEAL SPRAY, PART II: EVALUATING STEADINESS USING THE INTERPARTICLE TIME DISTRIBUTION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.5, 1995, issue 4&5
Christopher F. Edwards, K. D. Marx