Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Atomization and Sprays
Factor de Impacto: 1.737 Factor de Impacto de 5 años: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Imprimir: 1044-5110
ISSN En Línea: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volumen 30, 2020 Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v20.i4.60
pages 345-364

COMBINED SPRAY MODEL FOR GASOLINE DIRECT INJECTION HOLLOW-CONE SPRAYS

Philipp Pischke
Institute of Heat and Mass Transfer, RWTH Aachen University, Augustinerbach 6, 52062 Aachen, Germany
D. Martin
Institute of Heat and Mass Transfer, RWTH Aachen University, Eilfschornsteinstr. 18, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Reinhold Kneer
Institute of Heat and Mass Transfer, RWTH Aachen University, Augustinerbach 6, 52062 Aachen, Germany

SINOPSIS

Piezoinjectors with outwardly opening nozzles are the latest generation of high-pressure injectors for gasoline direct injection (GDI). In this study, a combined Eulerian-Lagrangian spray model is presented, which is based on user-defined implementations of all key models within a Fluent framework. Primary and secondary breakup is modeled with a combined LISA-KH-TAB approach. The LISA primary breakup model is extended by a one-dimensional model of the nozzle flow and by modified momentum source terms that lead to a more reasonable prediction of the near-nozzle continuous phase flow field. The KH and TAB secondary breakup models are applied to high and low Weber number secondary breakup, respectively. The collision model implemented accounts for all relevant collision regimes (i.e., coalescence, stretching separation, reflexive separation, and bouncing). For the bouncing and reflexive separation regimes, the momentum equations are modified because the standard equations cannot predict the trajectories after off-center collisions of differently sized droplets. Vaporization is modeled with a single-component model, which employs an analytical solution of the coupled heat and mass transfer equations. The combined model is validated with light scattering visualization and light sheet measurements, phase-doppler anemometry (PDA), and laser correlation velocimetry (LCV) at pressurized vaporizing- and nonvaporizing conditions. The validation indicates a good agreement of both macroscopic and microscopic properties, such as the spray geometry, vortex positions, or drop size distributions.


Articles with similar content:

TWO-FLUID MODELING OF SPRAY PENETRATION AND DISPERSION UNDER DIESEL ENGINE CONDITIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.15, 2005, issue 3
Venkatraman Iyer, John Abraham
ASSESSMENT OF ATOMIZATION MODELS FOR DIESEL ENGINE SIMULATIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 9
S. Som, Suresh Aggarwal
MODELING ATOMIZATION PROCESSES OF PRESSURE-SWIRL HOLLOW-CONE FUEL SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.7, 1997, issue 6
Rolf D. Reitz, Scott E. Parrish, Zhiyu Han, Patrick V. Farrell
AVERAGE DROPLET DIAMETER SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION IN A SPRAY AFTER GAS-ASSISTED PREMIXED ATOMIZATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.21, 2011, issue 8
Konstantin Pougatch, J. McMillan, Martha Eva Salcudean
MODELING AND SIMULATION OF WATER AND PVP/WATER EVAPORATING SPRAY FLOWS USING THE DIRECT QUADRATURE METHOD OF MOMENTS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.24, 2014, issue 5
E. Wimmer, Günter Brenn, Eva Gutheil, S. R. Gopireddy, R. M. Humza