Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Atomization and Sprays

Publicado 12 números por año

ISSN Imprimir: 1044-5110

ISSN En Línea: 1936-2684

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.2 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.8 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 0.3 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.00095 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.28 SJR: 0.341 SNIP: 0.536 CiteScore™:: 1.9 H-Index: 57

Indexed in

MODELING OF AIR-ASSISTED SPRAY BREAKUP OF UREA-WATER SOLUTION USING A VOLUME-OF-FLUID METHOD

Volumen 29, Edición 6, 2019, pp. 553-576
DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2019030987
Get accessGet access

SINOPSIS

Spray breakup is an important phenomenon for the injection of a urea-water solution in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems for efficient reduction of NOx (nitrogen oxides) from diesel engine exhaust gas. The resulting spray distribution of the urea-water solution has a high impact on the efficiency of the SCR system and possibly determines the formation of urea deposits. For air-assisted liquid breakup in a hot gas, the volume-of-fluid (VOF) simulation model is suitable to capture the interface between the liquid and gaseous fluids. In the current work, a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling for air-assisted spray breakup of the urea-water solution is done using a volume-of-fluid method. A second order high-resolution interface capturing (HRIC) convection discretization scheme is used to capture the interface between phases. A sharpening factor is used to reduce the numerical diffusion of the ligaments. An algorithm is written, which scans the ligaments from the running simulation at the predetermined time interval and export their properties. The simulation facilitates detailed investigation of spray characteristics such as spray penetration, spray angle, droplet spectrum, and the possibility of deposit formation on the injector. The spray characteristics from VOF simulations are in good agreement with the high-speed shadowgraphy measurements carried out at a hot gas test-rig. Consequently, our results demonstrate the benefits of using VOF method to understand the mechanism involved in air-assisted spray break of the urea-water solution in SCR applications and can be useful in determining the optimum operating conditions of the air-assisted urea-water solution injector.

REFERENCIAS
  1. Brackbill, J., Kothe, D., and Zemach, C., A Continuum Method for Modeling Surface Tension, J. Comp. Phys, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 335-354, 1992.

  2. Brodkey, R., The Phenomena of Fluid Motions, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1967.

  3. Dumouchel, C., On the Experimental Investigation on Primary Atomization of Liquid Streams, Exp. Fluids, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 371-422,2008.

  4. Edelbauer, W., Birkhold, F., Rankel, T., Pavlovic, Z., and Kolar, P., Simulation of the Liquid Break-Up at an AdBlue Injector with the Volume-of-Fluid Method Followed by Off-Line Coupled Lagrangian Particle Tracking, Comput. Fluids, vol. 157, pp. 294-311,2017.

  5. Edelbauer, W., Kolar, P., Schellander, D., Pavlovic, Z., and Almbauer, R., Numerical Simulation of Spray Breakup from Cavitating Nozzle Flow by Combined Eulerian-Eulerian and Volume-of-Fluid Methods, Int. J. Comp. Meth. Exp. Meas, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 314-325, 2018.

  6. Grosshans, H., Movaghar, A., Cao, L., Oeverman, M., Szasz, R.-Z., and Fuch, L., Sensitivity of VOF Simulations of the Liquid Jet Breakup to Physical and Numerical Parameters, Comput. Fluids, vol. 136, pp. 312-323,2016.

  7. Grosshans, H., Szasz, R., and Fuchs, L., Development of an Efficient Statistical Volumes of Fluid- Lagrangian Particle Tracking Coupling Method, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 898-918, 2014.

  8. Hebert, D., Schmidth, D., Knaus, D., Phillips, S., and Magari, P., Parallel VOF Spray Droplet Identification in an Unstructured Grid, ILASS-Americas: Institute of Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, 4th Annual Conference, May 21-23, Hartford, CT, 2008.

  9. Herrmann, M., Detail Numerical Simulation of the Primary Atomization of a Turbulent Liquid Jet in Cross- Flow, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 1-10, 2010.

  10. Herrmann, M., On Simulating Primary Atomization Using the Refined Level Set Grid Method, Atomization Spray, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 283-301, 2011.

  11. Kolev, N., Multiphase Flow Dynamics 2. Thermal and Mechanical Interactions, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2012.

  12. Leonard, B., Simple High-Accuracy Resolution Program for Convective Modelling of Discontinuities, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1291-1318, 1988.

  13. Levi, O., Freud, R., and Sher, E., Dynamic Surface Tension of Gasoline and Alcohol Fuel Blends, Atomization Sprays, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-5, 2017.

  14. Marmottant, P. and Villermaux, E., On Spray Formation, J. FluidMech, vol. 498, pp. 73-111, 2004.

  15. Muzaferija, S. and Peric, M., Computation of Free-Surface Flows Using Interface-Tracking and Interface-Capturing Methods, Nonlinear Water Wave Interaction, O. Mahrenholtz and M. Markiewcz, Eds., Southampton: WIT Press, 2017.

  16. Pilch, M. and Erdman, C., Use of Breakup Time Data and Velocity History to Predict the Maximum Size of Stable Fragments for Acceleration-Induced Breakup of a Liquid Drop, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 741-757,1987.

  17. Reitz, R. and Bracco, F., Mechanism of Breakup of Round Liquid Jets, Encycl. Fluid Mech, vol. 3, pp. 233-249, 1986.

  18. Shinjo, J. and Umemura, A., Simulation of Liquid Jet Primary Breakup: Dynamics of Ligaments and Droplets Formation, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 513-532,2010.

  19. Shinjo, J. and Umemura, A., Detailed Simulation of Primary Atomization Mechanisms in Diesel Jet Sprays (Isolated Identification of Liquid Jet Tip Effects), Pro. Combust. Inst., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 2089-2097, 2011.

  20. Spiteri, A., Liao, Y., and Eggenschwiler, P., Comparison of Pressure and Air-Assisted Atomizers for Urea-SCR Injection in Diesel Engine Exhaust, Proc. 14th Int. Stuttgarter Symp., M. Bargende, H.C. Reuss, and J. Wiedemann, Eds., pp. 911-921, 2014.

  21. StarCCM+, StarCCM+ Documentation, 2018.

  22. Strom, H., Lundstrom, A., and Andersson, B., Choice of Urea-Spray Models in CFD Simulations of Urea-SCR Systems, Chem. Eng. J, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 69-82,2009.

  23. Tomar, G., Fuster, D., Zaleski, S., andPopinet, S., Multiscale Simulations of Primary Atomization, Comput. Fluids, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1864-1874, 2010.

  24. Ubbink, O., Numerical Prediction of Two Fluid Systems with Sharp Interfaces, PhD, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 1997.

  25. Waclawczyk, T. and Koronowicz, T., Modeling of the Flow in Systems of Immiscible Fluids Using Volume of Fluid Method with CICSAM Scheme, Multiphase Flows Workshop, pp. 267-276, 2005.

  26. Waclawczyk, T. and Koronowicz, T., Comparison of CICSAM and HRIC High-Resolution Schemes for Interface Capturing, J. Theoret. Appl. Mech, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 325-345,2008.

  27. Xiao, F., Dianat, M., and McGuirk, J., LES of Turbulent Liquid Jet Primary Breakup in Turbulent Coaxial Air Flow, Int. J. Mult. Flow, vol. 60, pp. 103-118, 2014.

CITADO POR
  1. Payri Raul, Bracho Gabriela, Marti-Aldaravi Pedro, Marco-Gimeno Javier, Mixture Model Approach for the Study of the Inner Flow Dynamics of an AdBlue Dosing System and the Characterization of the Near-Field Spray, SAE Technical Paper Series, 1, 2021. Crossref

Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones Precios y Políticas de Suscripcione Begell House Contáctenos Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain