Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
TsAGI Science Journal

ISSN Imprimir: 1948-2590
ISSN En Línea: 1948-2604

TsAGI Science Journal

DOI: 10.1615/TsAGISciJ.2019032794
pages 483-498

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE INTERFERENCE EFFECT OF TRANSONIC WIND TUNNEL PERFORATED WALLS ON MODEL TEST RESULTS

Petr Vladimirovich Savin
Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI), Zhukovsky str. 1, Zhukovsky, 140180, Russia

SINOPSIS

This paper presents the results of a numerical investigation of the wind tunnel model relative size effect on experimentally obtained aerodynamic characteristics. The investigations were performed on computer-aided design geometry modeling the test section, plenum chamber, diffuser, supporting devices, and test object for the T-106 TsAGI transonic wind tunnel equipped with a closed-jet circular test section with perforated walls. A comparison is made between the calculation results for the model with conditionally infinite flow inside the test section and the experimental data. The calculations show that an increase in the relative size of the model leads to a decrease in the experimentally obtained lift-curve slope value, which is equal to one. Quantitative estimations were also made for the interference of the wind tunnel walls on the change in the flow velocity longitudinal component. The peculiarities of the flow through the perforated walls of the wind tunnel test section were also examined using visualization of the calculated results.

REFERENCIAS

  1. Ewald, B.F.R., et al., Wind Tunnel Wall Correction, NATO Technical Report AGARD-AG-336, October 1998.

  2. Glazkov, S.A. and Ivanova, V.M., Investigations of Induction of Permeable Wind Tunnel Walls Using the Known Parameters of the Flow around Them, Uch. Zap. TsAGI, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 115-119, 1982.

  3. Glazkov, S.A., Subsonic Flow around a Thin Airfoil in a Channel with Perforated Walls, Uch. Zap. TsAGI, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 3-12, 1991.

  4. Ashill, P.R. and Keating, R.F.A., Calculation of Tunnel Wall Interference from Wall Pressure Measurements, Aeronaut. J, vol. 92, no. 911, pp. 36-53, 1988.

  5. Ulbrich, N., Description of Panel Method Code ANTARES, NASA Technical Report NASA/CR-2000-209592, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, May 2000.

  6. Maseland, J.E.J., Laban, M., Van der Ven, H., and Kooi, J.W., Development of CFD-Based Interference Models for the DNW-HST Transonic Wind Tunnel, in Proc. of 25th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, Paper 2006-3639, San Francisco, CA, June 5-8, 2006.

  7. Bosnyakov, S.M., Vlasenko, V.V., Kursakov, I.A., Mikhaylov, S.V., and Quest, J., Problem of Interference of an Ogival Body of Revolution with the Wind-Tunnel Sting and Specific Features of Computing This Problem, TsAGISci. J, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 321-344, 2011.

  8. Grodzovsky, G.L., Nikolsky, A.A., Svishchev, G.P., and Taganov, G.I., Supersonic Gas Flows in Perforated Boundaries, Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1967 (in Russian).

  9. Ivanov, A.I., On a Calculation of Boundary Conditions of Wind Tunnel Ventilated Walls, Uch. Zap. TsAGI, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 61-68, 1985.

  10. Savin, P.V., Experimental Investigations of Wall Interference Effect on Model Test Results at TSAGI T-106 Wind Tunnel, TsAGI Sci. J, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 363-375, 2017.

  11. Sobachkin, A. and Dumnov, G., Numerical Basis of CAD-Embedded CFD, in Proc. ofNAFEMS World Congress, 2013.

  12. Ivanov, A., Trebunskikh, T., and Platonovich, V., Validation Methodology for Modern CAD-Embedded CFD Code: From Fundamental Tests to Industrial Benchmarks, in Proc. ofNAFEMS World Congress, 2013.

  13. Glauert, H., Wind Tunnel Interference on Wings, Bodies, and Airscrews, Aeronautical Research Committee Reports and Memoranda No. 1566, London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1933.

  14. Lam, C.G.K. and Bremhorst, K.A., Modified Form of Model for Predicting Wall Turbulence, ASMEJ. Fluids Eng., vol. 103, pp. 456-460, 1981.

  15. Schlichting, H., Boundary-Layer Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1955.

  16. Steinle, F. and Stanewsky, E., Wind Tunnel Flow Quality and Data Accuracy Requirements, NATO Technical Report AGARD-AR-184, November 1982.

  17. Bukharov, K.D., Petronevich, V.V., and Savin, P.V., Mathematical Model of TSAGI T-106 Transonic Wind Tunnel As Mach Number Control Target, MGTU GA Sci. J, vol. 223, pp. 109-114, 2016.


Articles with similar content:

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF WALL INTERFERENCE EFFECT ON MODEL TEST RESULTS AT TSAGI T-106 WIND TUNNEL
TsAGI Science Journal, Vol.48, 2017, issue 4
Petr Vladimirovich Savin
INVESTIGATION OF ACOUSTIC FLUCTUATIONS IN A FLOW WITH PERMEABLE BOUNDARIES USING HOT-WIRE ANEMOMETRY
TsAGI Science Journal, Vol.41, 2010, issue 2
V. A. Lebiga, V. N. Zinoviev
REVERSE FLOW PHENOMENON IN A ROTATING DIFFUSER
Journal of Flow Visualization and Image Processing, Vol.9, 2002, issue 2&3
Matevz Dular, Brane Sirok, Tom Bajcar
Dynamic Calibration of a Single Component Accelerometer Force Balance Using Delta Wing Model for Impulse Loads
Proceedings of the 25th National and 3rd International ISHMT-ASTFE Heat and Mass Transfer Conference (IHMTC-2019), Vol.0, 2019, issue
Pallekonda Ramesh Babu, Sushmita Deka, Maneswar Rahang
DEVELOPMENT OF A ZONAL RANS-IDDES APPROACH TO SIMULATE FLOW AROUND BODIES IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE COMPUTATIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN COMPUTATIONAL AEROACOUSTICS
TsAGI Science Journal, Vol.50, 2019, issue 6
Vladimir Evgenievich Makarov, Viktor Alexandrovich Shortstov