Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.207 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN Imprimir: 0278-940X
ISSN En Línea: 1943-619X

Volumes:
Volumen 47, 2019 Volumen 46, 2018 Volumen 45, 2017 Volumen 44, 2016 Volumen 43, 2015 Volumen 42, 2014 Volumen 41, 2013 Volumen 40, 2012 Volumen 39, 2011 Volumen 38, 2010 Volumen 37, 2009 Volumen 36, 2008 Volumen 35, 2007 Volumen 34, 2006 Volumen 33, 2005 Volumen 32, 2004 Volumen 31, 2003 Volumen 30, 2002 Volumen 29, 2001 Volumen 28, 2000 Volumen 27, 1999 Volumen 26, 1998 Volumen 25, 1997 Volumen 24, 1996 Volumen 23, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2016016046
pages 1-32

Haptic Neurorehabilitation and Virtual Reality for Upper Limb Paralysis: A Review

Leah Piggott
Psychology Department, Northern Michigan University, 1401 Presque Isle Avenue, Marquette, MI, 49855
Samantha Wagner
Psychology Department, Northern Michigan University, 1401 Presque Isle Avenue, Marquette, MI, 49855
Mounia Ziat
Department of Psychology, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, MI, 1401 Presque Isle Avenue, Marquette, MI, 49855

SINOPSIS

Motor and sensory loss or dysfunction affects the quality of life for thousands of individuals daily. The upper limb, and especially the hand, are important for a person's ability to complete activities of daily living. Traditional therapy methods focus on motor recovery, but future methods should include sensory recovery and should promote the use of the affected limb(s) at home. In this review, we highlight the current state-of-art robotic devices for the upper limb, and we discuss benefits of including haptic feedback and virtual reality environments during neurorehabilitation. Robotic devices, such as end-effector devices, grounded and ungrounded exoskeletons, have been developed to assist with various functions including individual finger, whole hand, and shoulder movements. Many robots highlighted in this paper are inexpensive and are small enough to be in a patient's home, or allow for telerehabilitation. Virtual reality creates safe environments for patients to practice motor movements and interactive games improve enjoyment of therapy. Haptic feedback creates more immersive virtual reality, and contributes to the recovery of sensory function. Physiological studies conducted after brain trauma and with robotic devices contribute to the understanding of brain plasticity, and illustrate the efficacy of these technologies. We conclude by addressing the future direction of neurorehabilitation research.


Articles with similar content:

Body Weight−Supported Treadmill Training After Spinal Cord Injury: Is There An Ideal Prescription For Intervention?
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.23, 2011, issue 1-4
Alyssa Fenuta , Audrey L. Hicks
Evaluation and Management of Neurogenic Bladder in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.12, 2000, issue 2
Sally A. Holmes, Timothy B. Boone, Jennifer Harrison
Management of Acute Flexor Tendon Injuries
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.13, 2001, issue 4
John S. Taras, Claude S. Williams
Rehabilitation of Neuropathies
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.19, 2007, issue 1
Wolfgang Grisold, Udo Zifko, Andrea Vass, Robert Schmidhammer
Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.10, 1998, issue 1
Agnete Jonsson, Mads H. Ravnborg