Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
SJR: 0.207 SNIP: 0.376 CiteScore™: 0.79

ISSN Imprimir: 0278-940X
ISSN En Línea: 1943-619X

Volumen 47, 2019 Volumen 46, 2018 Volumen 45, 2017 Volumen 44, 2016 Volumen 43, 2015 Volumen 42, 2014 Volumen 41, 2013 Volumen 40, 2012 Volumen 39, 2011 Volumen 38, 2010 Volumen 37, 2009 Volumen 36, 2008 Volumen 35, 2007 Volumen 34, 2006 Volumen 33, 2005 Volumen 32, 2004 Volumen 31, 2003 Volumen 30, 2002 Volumen 29, 2001 Volumen 28, 2000 Volumen 27, 1999 Volumen 26, 1998 Volumen 25, 1997 Volumen 24, 1996 Volumen 23, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v35.i3-4.20
pages 197-342

Pediatric Material Properties: A Review of Human Child and Animal Surrogates

Melanie Franklyn
Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sujanie Peiris
Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Christina Huber
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
King H. Yang
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA


Because pediatric tissue is difficult for researchers to obtain, the biomechanical responses of adult humans have been studied much more extensively than those of children. Piglets, chimpanzees, and other animals have been used as child surrogates, but the tissue properties and responses to impact forces obtained from these animals may not directly correlate with the human child, and this correlation is not well understood. Consequently, only a handful of human pediatric tissue properties are known. Child anthropomorphic test devices employed in automotive safety have been developed largely by scaling data obtained from adult human cadaveric tests, where various scaling methods have been used to account for differences in geometry, material properties, or a combination of these two parameters. Similar scaling techniques have also been implemented to develop injury assessment reference values for child anthropomorphic test devices. Nevertheless, these scaling techniques have not yet proven to be accurate, in part because of the lack of pediatric data. In this review, the properties of pediatric human and animal surrogate tissue that have been mechanically tested are evaluated. It was found that most of the pediatric tissue that has previously been tested pertains to the head, neck, cervical spine, and extremities. It is evident that some body regions, such as the head and neck, have been tested to some extent since injuries to these regions are critical from an injury perspective. On the other hand, there is limited pediatric data available for the thorax, abdomen, thoracic and lumbar spines and fetal-related tissue. This review presents the pediatric data available in the literature and highlights the body regions where further testing is needed.

Articles with similar content:

Biomechanics of Abdominal Injuries
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.29, 2001, issue 2
Narayan Yoganandan, Matthew R. Maltese, Frank A. Pintar
Static and Dynamic Bracing for Loss of Motion Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.25, 2015, issue 4
Todd P. Pierce, Jeffery J. Cherian, Michael A. Mont
Evidence-Informed Management of Chronic Low Back Pain with Lumbar Strengthening and McKenzie Exercise
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.20, 2008, issue 4
Vert Mooney, Thomas E. Dreisinger
Etiology and Biomechanics of Midfoot (Lisfranc) Injuries in Athletes
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.43, 2015, issue 2-3
Kirk A. McCullough, Brent Lievers, Richard W. Kent, Jeff R. Crandall, Rebecca E. Frimenko
Current Concepts in Sports-Related Concussion
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.43, 2015, issue 5-6
Fred Xavier, Neil B. Mulchandani , Ahmed M. Eldib , William P. Urban, David B. Frumberg, Dipal Chatterjee, Subrata Saha, Scott E. Barbash