Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems
Factor de Impacto: 2.9 Factor de Impacto de 5 años: 3.72 SJR: 0.573 SNIP: 0.551 CiteScore™: 2.43

ISSN Imprimir: 0743-4863
ISSN En Línea: 2162-660X

Volumes:
Volumen 36, 2019 Volumen 35, 2018 Volumen 34, 2017 Volumen 33, 2016 Volumen 32, 2015 Volumen 31, 2014 Volumen 30, 2013 Volumen 29, 2012 Volumen 28, 2011 Volumen 27, 2010 Volumen 26, 2009 Volumen 25, 2008 Volumen 24, 2007 Volumen 23, 2006 Volumen 22, 2005 Volumen 21, 2004 Volumen 20, 2003 Volumen 19, 2002 Volumen 18, 2001 Volumen 17, 2000 Volumen 16, 1999 Volumen 15, 1998 Volumen 14, 1997 Volumen 13, 1996 Volumen 12, 1995

Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v22.i3.10
pages 215-294

Optimizing Drug Delivery Systems Using Systematic "Design of Experiments." Part II: Retrospect and Prospects

Bhupinder Singh
University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UGC Centre of Advanced Studies, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India 160014; UGC Centre of Excellence in Applications of Nanomaterials, Nanoparticles and Nanocomposites (Biomedical Sciences), Panjab University, Chandigarh, India 160014
Manju Dahiya
Pharmaceutics Division, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
Vandana Saharan
Pharmaceutics Division, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
Naveen Ahuja
Pharmaceutics Division, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

SINOPSIS

The first study on application of Design of Experiments (DoE) in optimizing drug formulation appeared in 1967. Since then the number of literature reports on the use of DoE optimization in development of drug delivery technologies has been piling up steadily. Such systematic techniques find their use in every type of conventional dosage form and modern drug delivery system. The drug delivery devices investigated for optimization using response surface methodology include controlled release compressed matrices, microparticulates, macroparticulates, vesicular systems, floating systems, bioadhesive systems, semisolids, transdermals, and inhalations. The optimized processes mainly include extrusion-spheronization, pelletization, microencapsulation, coating, granulation, and tableting.
Part I of this article [Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 2005; 22(1):27-106] dealt with the salient steps involved in the DoE optimization methodology using diverse experimental designs. Part II deals with various retrospective literature findings as well as the prospective application of such DoE procedures while optimizing varied drug delivery technologies. A vast account of various DoE reports on optimization of diverse drug delivery system and processes along with the critical graphical analysis of various designs, input, and response variables have been presented here in a categorical form. Such an explicit and updated review on drug delivery optimization has not been published anywhere else in the recent past.


Articles with similar content:

Oral Absorption Promoters: Opportunities, Issues, and Challenges
Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, Vol.32, 2015, issue 5
Sushilkumar Patil, Girish Kore, Atul Kolate, Chetan Yewale, Ambikanandan Misra
Strategies and Therapeutic Opportunities for the Delivery of Drugs to the Esophagus
Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, Vol.25, 2008, issue 3
Hannah Batchelor, Liang Zhang, Barbara R. Conway, Danielle Russell
Gastroretentive Floating Drug-Delivery Systems: A Critical Review
Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, Vol.28, 2011, issue 1
Moji Christianah Adeyeye, Udaya Kotreka
Options for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.22, 2012, issue 4
Scott Perrapato, Jared Wachterman, Mark Plante
Progress Toward Skeletal Gene Therapy
Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Vol.14, 2004, issue 1&2
Henry J. Klamut, Shin-Tai Chen, David J. Baylink, K.-H. William Lau