Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology
Factor de Impacto: 1.404 Factor de Impacto de 5 años: 3.347 SJR: 0.706 SNIP: 0.55 CiteScore™: 2.19

ISSN Imprimir: 1040-8401
ISSN En Línea: 2162-6472

Volumes:
Volumen 40, 2020 Volumen 39, 2019 Volumen 38, 2018 Volumen 37, 2017 Volumen 36, 2016 Volumen 35, 2015 Volumen 34, 2014 Volumen 33, 2013 Volumen 32, 2012 Volumen 31, 2011 Volumen 30, 2010 Volumen 29, 2009 Volumen 28, 2008 Volumen 27, 2007 Volumen 26, 2006 Volumen 25, 2005 Volumen 24, 2004 Volumen 23, 2003 Volumen 22, 2002 Volumen 21, 2001 Volumen 20, 2000 Volumen 19, 1999 Volumen 18, 1998 Volumen 17, 1997 Volumen 16, 1996 Volumen 15, 1995 Volumen 14, 1994

Critical Reviews™ in Immunology

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v29.i5.30
pages 399-418

Current Vaccination Strategies for the Treatment of B-Cell Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma

Nurit Hollander
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

SINOPSIS

Therapeutic vaccines have been developed to induce immune responses capable of eradicating lymphoma and myeloma tumors. Most of these vaccines target the immunoglobulin idiotype (Id) as a tumor-specific antigen. Phase I/II clinical trials of Id vaccination in lymphoma demonstrated that some lymphoma patients could mount immune responses that were correlated with a favorable clinical outcome. These encouraging results initiated phase III trials of Id vaccination in lymphoma, the results of which have been recently released. Disappointingly, only one of three phase III studies achieved the primary end point of progression-free survival. Detailed analysis of these results is awaited to help identify factors that determine clinical efficacy of Id vaccination as reflected in the three trials. Unlike lymphoma, studies of Id vaccination in multiple myeloma have yielded far less evidence of clinical benefit. Although Id vaccines induce immune responses in myeloma patients, their efficacy is insufficient to provide a clear clinical benefit. Strategies to improve lymphoma and myeloma vaccines are currently tested with an emphasis on optimization of antigen delivery and presentation and modulation of the immune system toward enhancement of T-cell function. Despite many hurdles yet to overcome, it is hoped that newly developed strategies that augment both immune and clinical responses will allow effective vaccination resulting in tumor eradication.


Articles with similar content:

The Immune System in the Pathogenesis of Ovarian Cancer
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.33, 2013, issue 2
Ellen L. Goode, Kimberly R. Kalli, Keith L. Knutson, Melissa S. DeRycke, Bridget Charbonneau
Oncogenic RAS: From Its Activation to Its Direct Targeting
Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis, Vol.22, 2017, issue 3-4
Apostolos Zaravinos
Cell Death Induction in Cancer Therapy − Past, Present, and Future
Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis, Vol.21, 2016, issue 3-4
Marc-Eric Halatsch, Sebastian Hasslacher, Klaus-Michael Debatin, Oliver Brühl, Julia Zimmermann, Katia La Ferla-Brühl, Lisa Nonnenmacher, Timo Burster, Mike-Andrew Westhoff, Sara E. Barry, Markus D. Siegelin, Georg Karpel-Massler
Immune Responses to BRAF-Targeted Therapy in Melanoma: Is Targeted Therapy Immunotherapy?
Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis, Vol.21, 2016, issue 1-2
Mark C. Kelley
Opportunities for Translation from the Bench: Therapeutic Intervention of the JAK/STAT Pathway in Neuroinflammatory Diseases
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, Vol.35, 2015, issue 6
Yudong Liu, Etty N. Benveniste, Hongwei Qin, Sara A. Gibson