Suscripción a Biblioteca: Guest
Portal Digitalde Biblioteca Digital eLibros Revistas Referencias y Libros de Ponencias Colecciones
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
SJR: 0.468 SNIP: 0.905 CiteScore™: 1.65

ISSN Imprimir: 1072-8325
ISSN En Línea: 1940-431X

Volumen 26, 2020 Volumen 25, 2019 Volumen 24, 2018 Volumen 23, 2017 Volumen 22, 2016 Volumen 21, 2015 Volumen 20, 2014 Volumen 19, 2013 Volumen 18, 2012 Volumen 17, 2011 Volumen 16, 2010 Volumen 15, 2009 Volumen 14, 2008 Volumen 13, 2007 Volumen 12, 2006 Volumen 11, 2005 Volumen 10, 2004 Volumen 9, 2003 Volumen 8, 2002 Volumen 7, 2001 Volumen 6, 2000 Volumen 5, 1999 Volumen 4, 1998 Volumen 3, 1997 Volumen 2, 1995 Volumen 1, 1994

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2019024449
pages 167-183


Pia Spangenberger
Technische Universität Berlin, Institute for Vocational Education and Work Studies, Machrstraße 23, 10587 Berlin, Germany
Johannes Meyser
Technische Universität Berlin, Institute for Vocational Education and Work Studies, Machrstraße 23, 10587 Berlin, Germany
Ulf Schrader
Technische Universität Berlin, Institute for Vocational Education and Work Studies, Machrstraße 23, 10587 Berlin, Germany


Previous studies have examined whether a commitment to social responsibility can increase the attractiveness of the Engineering and Technology (ET) field for women. Because female employees feel that in ET professions they are not living out social values that are important to them, they tend to leave ET-associated professions in the long-term. One area in which social responsibility plays a major role is sustainability, and, in the future, ET professions will have a large impact on sustainable development as described in the new sustainable development goals by the United Nations in 2015. In this paper we will introduce the concept of the Sustainably Utility Value (SyUV) based on the term Social Utility Value used by Watt and Richardson (2007), combining social and environmental aspects. Analyzing the data from 30 qualitative interviews with employees in the German wind power industry, we determine how SyUV and women's career choice in the field of ET interact, and even more importantly, how SyUV can foster long-term loyalty to an ET-associated profession. Using qualitative content analysis, we establish a typology of SyUV and Career Choice, developing five different types of sustainability-inclined individuals: The Sustainability Activist, the Sustainable Technology Enthusiast, the Sustainability Motivated Job Changer, the Sustainability Discoverer, and the Pure ET Fan. Our findings show that SyUV was of great significance for the employees interviewed when it came to their career choice, and that it was more significant for women than men. Finally, SyUV seems to especially strengthen women's persistency in the ET field in the long-term.


  1. Blanco, I., & Kjaer, C. (2009). Wind at work: Wind energy and job creation in the EU. Brussels, Belgium: European Wind Energy Association.

  2. Canney, N. E., & Bielefeldt, A. R. (2015). Gender differences in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students and how they change over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(3), 215-237.

  3. Cech, E. (2015). Engineers and engineeresses? Self-conceptions and the development of gendered professional identities. Sociological Perspectives, 58(1), 56-77.

  4. Clancy, J. S., Oparaocha, S., & Roehr, U. (2004). Gender equity and renewable energies: Thematic back-ground paper.

  5. Delicado, A. (2014). Not without the people. Public engagement with renewable energy in Portugal. Soziale Technik, 24(1), 8-10.

  6. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585-609.

  7. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review Psychology, 53, 109-132.

  8. Eurostat, the Statistical Office of the European Union. (2017). Employment by sex, age and detailed economic activity (from 2008 onwards, NACE Rev. 2 two digit level) - 1 000. Retrieved from http://

  9. Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training. (2017). Not always just a purely male domain. BIBB analysis of men and women in technical training occupations. Bonn, Germany: Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training.

  10. Federal Statistical Office (Germany). (2018). Students enrolled in STEM courses: Students, by selected subject groups. Retrieved from

  11. Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

  12. Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy. (2015). Fourth monitoring report "the energy of the future" 2014-summary. Berlin, Germany: The Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy Public Relations.

  13. Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545-579.

  14. Greening, B., & Azapagic, A. (2013). Environmental impacts of micro-wind turbines and their potential to contribute to UK climate change targets. Energy, 59(C), 454-466.

  15. Grunwald, A., & Rosch, C. (2011). Sustainability assessment of energy technologies: Towards an integrative framework. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 1(3), 1-10.

  16. Hall, L. E. (2007). Who s afraid of Marie Curie?: The challenges facing women in science and technology. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.

  17. Hanappi-Egger, E. (2013). Backstage: The organizational gendered agenda in science, engineering and technology professions. European Journal of Women's Studies, 20(3), 279-294.

  18. Hill, C., Corbett, C., and St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.

  19. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

  20. International Labour Organization. (2017). World employment social outlook: Trends 2017. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.

  21. Janser, M. (2018). The greening of jobs in Germany: First evidence from a text mining based index and employment register data. IAB Discussion Paper, 14/2018. Nuremberg, Germany: Institute of Employment Research of the Federal Employment Agency.

  22. Kanji, S., & Hupka-Brunner, S. (2015). Young women's strong preference for children and subsequent occupational gender segregation: What is the link? Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 34(2), 124-140.

  23. Kluge, S. (2000). Empirically grounded construction of types and typologies in qualitative social research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), 1-11.

  24. Konig, J., & Rothland, M. (2013). Pedagogical knowledge and job-specific motivation at the beginning of teacher training. On the relation between cognitive and non-cognitive enrollment characteristics among students in teacher training. Zeitschrift furPadagogik, 59(1), 43-65.

  25. Lehr, U., Edler, D., O'Sullivan, M., Peter, F., & Bickel, P. (2015). Beschaftigung durch erneuerbare Energien in Deutschland: Ausbau undBetrieb, heute und morgen: Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums fur Wirtschaft und Energie. Osnabruck, Berlin, Stuttgart: Endbericht.

  26. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A., & Futing Liao, T. (2004). The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

  27. Liming, D., & Hamilton, J. (2010). Careers in wind energy. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, Winter 2010, 13-19.

  28. Lips-Wiersma, M., & Wright, S. (2012). Measuring the meaning of meaningful work development and validation of the comprehensive meaningful work scale (CMWS). Group & Organization Management, 37(5), 655-685.

  29. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2).

  30. Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 266-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

  31. McGovern, G. (2010). The windskill initiative: A systematic approach to wind energy qualifications. Osnabruck, Germany: Windskill Intelligent Energy Europe.

  32. Miller-Tiedemann, A., & Tiedemann, D. V. (1990). Career decision making: An individualistic perspective. In D. Brown, & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development. Applying contemporary theories to practice. (2nd ed., pp. 308-337). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  33. Mruck, K., & Mey, G. (2000). Qualitative research in Germany. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1).

  34. O'Sullivan, M., Edler, D., & Lehr, U. (2018). Okonomische indikatoren des energiesystems: Methode, abgrenzung und ergebnisse fur den zeitraum 2000-2016. Osnabruck, Germany: GWS Specialists in Empirical Economic Research.

  35. Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity. Can we live within the doughnut? Oxford, UK: Oxfam International.

  36. Raworth, K. (2013). Doughnut economics. Chicago, IL: Center for Humans and Nature.

  37. Schreiner, C., & Sjoberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE: Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (The relevance of science education): A comparative study of students' views of science and science education. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo, Department of Teacher Education and School Development.

  38. Schwieters, N., Ull, T., & Meyer, R. (2012). Volle Kraft aus Hochseewind. Germany: Dusseldorf, Pricewa-terhouseCoopers AG.

  39. Seron, C., Silbey, S. S., Cech, E., & Rubineau, B. (2016). Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work and Occupation, 43(2), 178-214.

  40. Sjoberg, S. & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project. Overview and key findings. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.

  41. Songlin, T., Xiliang, Z., & Licheng, W. (2011). Life cycle analysis of wind power: A case of Fuzhou. Energy Procedia, 5(2011), 1847-1851.

  42. Spangenberger, P. (2016). Zum einfluss eines nachhaltigkeitsbezugs auf die wahl technischer berufe durch frauen: Eine analyse am beispiel des windenergiesektors. Detmold, Germany: Eusl.

  43. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.

  44. Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development. Applying contemporary theories to practice. (2nd ed., pp. 197-261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  45. United Nations. General Assembly. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015: Seventieth session. Agenda items 15 and 116. A/RES/70/1.

  46. United Nations. (2018). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from

  47. Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-choice scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167-202.

  48. Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W., & Pietsch, J. (2009). Choosing to teach in the "STEM" disciplines: Characteristics and motivations of science, technology, and mathematics teachers from Australia and the United States. In A. Selkirk & M. Tichenor (Eds.), Teacher education: Policy, practice and research (pp. 285-309). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

  49. Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Beyer, B., Trautwein, U., & Baumert, J. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: An international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 791-805.

  50. Witzel, A. (2000). The problem-centered interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1).

  51. Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of 'backyard motives'. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(6), 1188-1207.

  52. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future, chapter 2: Towards sustainable development (A/42/427). Geneva, Switzerland: World Commission on Environment and Development.

Articles with similar content:

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.21, 2015, issue 4
Yufeng Lai, Samuel L. Myers, Jr., Kaye Husbands Fealing
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.21, 2015, issue 4
Emily Akoth Tenge, Hesborn O. Wao, Georgiadis Owuor Odondi, Joel Ochieng Wao, Chrystal A.S. Smith, Reginald S. Lee
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.24, 2018, issue 2
Jennifer C. Batra, Robyn F. Wilson, Patrice M. Buzzanell, Ziyu Long, Klod Kokini, Lindsey B. Anderson
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.17, 2011, issue 1
Ruth E. Fassinger, Jill D. Paquin
Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, Vol.7, 2001, issue 1
Krishna Athreya, Yalem Teshome, Nancy Maushak