Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
SJR: 0.121 SNIP: 0.228 CiteScore™: 0.5

ISSN Druckformat: 0896-2960
ISSN Online: 2162-6553

Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.2019030529
pages 101-123

Factors Affecting Upper Extremity Kinematics in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review

Pavapriya Ponvel
Physiotherapy Programme and Center for Healthy Aging and Wellness, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
Devinder Kaur Ajith Singh
Physiotherapy Programme and Center for Healthy Aging and Wellness, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
Gan Kok Beng
Centre of Advanced Electronic and Communication Engineering (PAKET), Faculty of Electrical and System Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Siaw Chui Chai
Occupational Therapy Programme, Center for Rehabilitation and Special Needs, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

ABSTRAKT

Understanding upper extremity (UE) kinematics in healthy adults is vital for comparison with adults with impairments. Although UE kinematics may be associated with several factors, information regarding these factors among healthy adults is limited. In this systematic review, we explored and summarized information regarding the factors that affect UE kinematics during functional movements and activities of daily living (ADL) among healthy adults. We searched databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCOHost, Scopus and Science Direct for relevant papers. A manual review of the retrieved articles was performed. Only papers published in English and that involved healthy participants with no UE impairments were included in this review. A paper was also included if it involved functional movement or ADL. Critical appraisal was performed using the Quality of Cross Sectional Studies assessment tool. Our search identified 1,108 articles, and 26 articles were retrieved based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The following factors were identified as affecting UE kinematics: age, gender, physical activity level, body mass index, limb dominance, features related to the target (target size and target position) and social interaction. Although these factors are associated with UE kinematics, how these factors influence UE movements remains unclear. An in-depth comprehension of UE kinematics and related factors is crucial to provide optimal care for clients during rehabilitation.

REFERENZEN

  1. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Longhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Collab. 2014;11(11):1465-858.

  2. Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd RN. Efficacy of upper limb therapies for unilateral cerebral palsy: a metaanalysis. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):e175-e204. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-0675.

  3. Binder A, Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, Shields N. Exercise reduces impairment and improves activity in people after some upper limb fractures: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2011;57(2):71-82. doi:10.1016/ S1836-9553(11)70017-0.

  4. Sandin A, Karolinska A. Effects of a hand training programme in five patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Occup Ther Int. 2005;12(1):14-27.

  5. Walker-Bone K, Palmer KT, Reading I, Coggon D, Cooper C. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2004; 51(4):642-51. doi:10.1002/art.20535.

  6. Miller C, Peek AL, Power D, Heneghan NR. Psychological consequences oftraumatic upper limb peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review. Hand Ther. 2017; 22(1):35-45. doi:10.1177/1758998316679387.

  7. Keogh JP, Nuwayhid I, Gordon JL, Gucer PW. The impact of occupational injury on injured worker and family: outcomes of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in Maryland workers. Am J Ind Med. 2000; 38(5):498-506. doi:10.1002/1097-0274(2000n)38:5<498::AID-AJIM2>3.0.C0;2-I.

  8. De Los Reyes-Guzman A, Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, Trincado-Alonso F, Monasterio-Huelin F, Torricelli D, Gil-Agudo A. Quantitative assessment based on kinematic measures of functional impairments during upper extremity movements: a review. Clin Biomech. 2014; 29(7):719-27. doi:10.1016/j.clinbio- mech.2014.06.013.

  9. Millan-Calenti JC, Tubio J, Pita-Fernandez S, Gonzalez-Abraldes I, Lorenzo T, Fernandez-Arruty T, Maseda A. Prevalence of functional disability in activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and associated factors, as predictors of morbidity and mortality. Arch Gerontol Geriatrics. 2010;50(3):306-10. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2009.04.017.

  10. Gilliaux M, Dierckx F, Vanden Berghe L, Lejeune TM, Sapin J, Dehez B, Stoquart G, Detrembleur C. Age effects on upper limb kinematics assessed by the reaplan robot in healthy school-aged children. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015; 43(5):1123-31. doi:10.1007/s10439-014-1189-z.

  11. Aluri AN, Sobhani E, Patel S. The most common goniometric measurement technique for wrist flexion and extension amongst occupational therapists, physical therapists, and hand therapists-an investigative study. J Hand Ther. 2018; 31(1):161-62. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2017.11.028.

  12. Rider LG, Koziol D, Giannini EH, Jain MS, Smith MR, Whitney-Mahoney K, Feldman BM, Wright SJ, Lindsley CB, Pachman LM, Villalba ML, Lovell DJ, Bowyer SL, Plots PH, Miller FW, Hicks JE. Validation of manual muscle testing and a subset of eight muscles for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(4):465-72. doi:10.1002/acr.20035.

  13. Bohannon RW, Peolsson A, Massy-Westropp N, Desrosiers J, Bear-Lehman J. Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2006;92(1):11-15. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2005.05.003.

  14. Senk M, Cheze L. A new method for motion capture of the scapula using an optoelectronic tracking device: a feasibility study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2010;13(3):397-401. doi:10.1080/10255840903263945.

  15. Charbonnier C, Chague S, Kolo FC, Chow JCK, Ladermann A. A patient-specific measurement technique to model shoulder joint kinematics. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100(7):715-19. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.015.

  16. Ketcham CJ, Seidler RD, Van Gemmert AWA, Stelmach GE. Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57(1):P54-P64.

  17. Roy J-S, MacDermid JC, Boyd KU, Faber KJ, Drosdowech D, Athwal GS. Rotational strength, range of motion, and function in people with unaffected shoulders from various stages of life. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2009;1(1):4. doi:10.1186/1758-2555-1-4.

  18. Gulde P, Hermsdorfer J. Both hands at work: the effect of aging on upper-limb kinematics in a multistep activity of daily living. Exp Brain Res. 2017;235(5):1337-48. doi:10.1007/s00221-017-4897-4.

  19. Krishnan-Barman S, Forbes PAG, Hamilton AFDC. How can the study of action kinematics inform our understanding of human social interaction? Neuropsychologia. 2017;105:101-10. doi:10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2017.01.018.

  20. Barral J, Debh B. Aiming in adults: sex and laterality effects. Laterality. 2004;9(3):299-312. doi:10.1080/13576500342000158.

  21. Vincent HK, Vincent KR, Lamb KM. Obesity and mobility disability in the older adult. Obes Rev. 2010;11(8):568-79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00703.x.

  22. Holviala J, Kraemer WJ, Sillanpaa E, Karppinen H, Avela J, Kauhanen A, Hakkinen A, Hakkinen K. Effects of strength, endurance and combined training on muscle strength, walking speed and dynamic balance in aging men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(4):1335-47. doi:10.1007/s00421-011-2089-7.

  23. Downes MJ, Brennan ML, Williams HC, Dean RS. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):1-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjo- pen-2016-011458.

  24. Gribble PL. Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89(5):2396-405. doi:10.1152/jn.01020.2002.

  25. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Bastian AJ, Hu Q, Edwards DF, Sahrmann SA, Dromerick AW. Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2005;166(1):126-36. doi:10.1007/s00221-005- 2350-6.

  26. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2002;22(18):8297-304.

  27. Rodriguez-Aranda C, Mittner M, Vasylenko O. Association between executive functions, working memory, and manual dexterity in young and healthy older adults. Percept Mot Skills. 2016;122(1):165- 92. doi:10.1177/0031512516628370.

  28. Murphy AJ, Lockie RG, Coutts AJ. Kinematic determinants of early acceleration in field sport athletes. J Sport Sci Med. 2003;2(4):144-50. doi:10.1016/S1440-2440(03)80304-3.

  29. Barnes CJ, Van Steyn SJ, Fischer RA. The effects of age, sex, and shoulder dominance on range of motion of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2001;10(3):242-46. doi:10.1067/mse.2001.115270.

  30. Maitra KK, Junkins MD. Upper extremity movement pattern of a common drinking task in well elderly women: a pilot study. Occup Ther Int. 2004;11(2):67-81. doi:10.1002/oti.198.

  31. Berrigan F, Simoneau M, Tremblay A, Hue O, Teasdale N. Influence of obesity on accurate and rapid arm movement performed from a standing posture. Int J Obes. 2006;30(12):1750-57. doi:10.1038/ sj.ijo.0803342.

  32. Grosskopf A, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP. Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study. Exp Brain Res. 2006;168(1-2):230-40. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0083-1.

  33. Fernandez L, Warren WH, Bootsma RJ. Kinematic adaptation to sudden changes in visual task constraints during reciprocal aiming. Hum Mov Sci. 2006;25(6):695-717. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2006.05.001.

  34. Kalisch T, Willimzig C, Kleibel N, Tegenthoff M, Dinse HR. Age-related attenuation of dominant hand superiority. PLoS One. 2006;1(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000090.

  35. Wang J, Sainburg RL. The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance. Exp Brain Res. 2007;178(4):565-70. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0936-x.

  36. Pei Y-C, Chou S-W, Lin P-S, Lin Y-C, Hsu THC, Wong AMK. Eye-hand coordination of elderly people who practice Tai Chi Chuan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107(2):103-10. doi:10.1016/S0929- 6646(08)60123-0.

  37. Poston B, Van Gemmert AWA, Barduson B, Stelmach GE. Movement structure in young and elderly adults during goal-directed movements of the left and right arm. Brain Cogn. 2009;69(1):30-38. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.05.002.

  38. Vandenberghe A, Levin O, De Schutter J, Swinnen S, Jonkers I. Three-dimensional reaching tasks: effect of reaching height and width on upper limb kinematics and muscle activity. Gait Posture. 2010;32(4):500-7. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.009.

  39. Wild KS, Poliakoff E, Jerrison A, Gowen E. The inXuence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation. Exp Brain Res. 2010;204(3):353-60. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2034-8.

  40. Przybyla A, Haaland KY, Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Motor asymmetry reduction in older adults. Neurosci Lett. 2011;489(2):99-104. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.11.074.

  41. Rand MK, Stelmach GE. Effects of hand termination and accuracy requirements on eye-hand coordination in older adults. Behav Brain Res. 2011;219(1):39-46. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.12.008.

  42. Cheong Y, Shehab RL, Ling C. Effects of age and psychomotor ability on kinematics of mouse-mediated aiming movement. Ergonomics. 2013;56(6):1006-20. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.781682.

  43. Panzer S, Boyle JB, Shea CH. Additional load decreases movement time in the wrist but not in arm movements at ID 6. Exp Brain Res. 2013;224(2):243-53. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3303-5.

  44. Van Halewyck F, Lavrysen A, Levin O, Boisgontier MP, Elliott D, Helsen WF. Both age and physical activity level impact on eye-hand coordination. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;36:80-96. doi:10.1016/j.hu- mov.2014.05.005.

  45. Van Halewyck F, Lavrysen A, Levin O, Elliott D, Helsen WF. The impact of age and physical activity level on manual aiming performance. J Aging Phys Act. 2015;23(2):169-79. doi:10.1123/japa.2013-0104.

  46. Varghese R, Hui-Chan CWY, Bhatt T. Effects of tai chi on a functional arm reaching task in older adults: a cross-sectional study. J Aging Phys Act. 2015;23(3):361-68. doi:10.1F23/japa.2014-0031.

  47. Bek J, Poliakoff E, Marshall H, Trueman S, Gowen E. Enhancing voluntary imitation through attention and motor imagery. Exp Brain Res. 2016;234(7):1819-28. doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4570-3.

  48. Gilliaux M, Lejeune TM, Sapin J, Dehez B, Stoquart G, Detrembleur C. Age effects on upper limb kinematics assessed by the Reaplan robot in healthy subjects aged 3 to 93 years. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(4):1224-33. doi:10.1007/s10439-015-1396-2.

  49. Singh DK, Bailey M, Lee R. Biplanar measurement of thoracolumbar curvature in older adults using an electromagnetic tracking device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(1):137-42. doi:10.1016/j. apmr.2009.08.145.

  50. Singh DKA, Bailey M, Lee RYW. Ageing modifies the fibre angle and biomechanical function of the lumbar extensor muscles. Clin Biomech. 2011a;26(6):543-47. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.02.002.

  51. Singh DKA, Bailey M, Lee R. Strength and fatigue of lumbar extensor muscles in older adults. Muscle Nerve. 2011b;44(1):74-79. doi:10.1002/mus.21998.

  52. Singh KAD, Bailey M, Lee R. Decline in lumbar extensor muscle strength the older adults: correlation with age, gender and spine morphology. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(215):1-6.

  53. VanAndel CJ, Wolterbeek N, Doorenbosch CAM, Veeger DJ, Harlaar J. Complete 3D kinematics off upper extremity functional tasks. Gait Posture. 2008;27(1):120-27. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.002.

  54. Hernandez ME, Ashton-Miller JA, Alexander NB. Age-related differences in maintenance of balance during forward reach to the floor. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(8):960-67. doi:10.1093/ gerona/gls260.

  55. Jette NG, Lim YL, Lim HL, Mokhtar SA, Gan KB, Singh DKA. Lumbar kinematics, functional disability and fear avoidance beliefs among adults with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016;16(4):e430-e436. doi:10.18295/squmj.2016.16.04.005.

  56. Saidu I, Abbas A, Jajere A, Maduagwu S, Adetunji O. Lumbar spinal mobility changes among adults with advancing age. J Midlife Health. 2011;2(2):65. doi:10.4103/0976-7800.92526.

  57. De Vries EA, Caljouw SR, Coppens MJM, Postema K, Verkerke GJ, Lamoth CJC. Differences between young and older adults in the control of weight shifting within the surface of support. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):1-8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098494.

  58. Kraft E. Cognitive function, physical activity, and aging: possible biological links and implications for multimodal interventions. Aging, Neuropsychol Cogn. 2012;19(1-2):248-63. doi:10.1080/13825585. 2011.645010.

  59. Brustio PR, Magistro D, Zecca M, Rabaglietti E, Liubicich ME. Age-related decrements in dual-task performance: comparison of different mobility and cognitive tasks. A cross sectional study. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):1-15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181698.

  60. Ketcham CJ, Dounskaia N V, Stelmach GE. Age-related differences in the control of multijoint movements. Motor Control. 2004;8:422-36. doi:10.1080/02701367.1992.10608758.

  61. Krampe RT. Aging, expertise and fine motor movement. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26(7):769-76. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00064-7.

  62. Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing proprioception: a systematic review of possibilities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):933-49. doi:10.1177/1545968315573055.

  63. Brown DE, Martin BJ, Brown SH. Age-related differences in upper limb proprioceptive acuity. Perpetual Motor Skills. 2007 Jun;104(3 Pt 2):1297-309.

  64. Madden DJ. Aging and visual attention. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(2):70-74. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8721.2007.00478.x.

  65. Sahin F, Atalay NS, Akkaya N, Aksoy S. Factors affecting the results of the functional dexterity test. J Hand Ther. 2017;30(1):74-79. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2016.04.005.

  66. Pheasant S, Haslegrave CM. Bodyspace: anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018.

  67. Peters A. Structural changes that occur during normal aging of primate cerebral hemispheres. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26(7):733-41. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00060-X.

  68. Ashendorf L, Vanderslice-Barr JL, McCaffrey RJ. Motor tests and cognition in healthy older adults. Appl Neuropsychol. 2009;16(3):171-76. doi:10.1080/09084280903098562.

  69. Cabeza R. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The HAROLD model. Psychol Aging. 2002;17(1):85-100. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.85.

  70. Sainburg RL, Kalakanis D. Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83(5):2661-75. doi:10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2661.

  71. Sainburg RL. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res. 2002;142(2):241-58. doi:10.1007/s00221-001-0913-8.

  72. Cabeza R, Daselaar SM, Dolcos F, Prince SE, Budde M, Nyberg L. Task-independent and task-specific age effects on brain activity during working memory, visual attention and episodic retrieval. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14(4):364-75. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg133.

  73. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2014;89(1):81-88.

  74. Buchman AS, Leurgans S, Gottlieb GL, Chen CH, Almeida GL, Corcos DM. Effect of age and gender in the control of elbow flexion movements. J Mot Behav. 2000;32(4):391-99. doi:10.1080/00222890009601388.

  75. Soucie JM, Wang C, Forsyth A, Funk S, Benny M, Roach KE, Boone D, The Hemophilia Treatment Center Network. Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia. 2011;17(3):500-7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02399.x.

  76. Chau N, Gauchard GC, Siegfried C, Benamghar L, Dangelzer JL, Francais M, Jacquin R, Sourdot A, Perrin PP, Mur JM. Relationships of job, age, and life conditions with the causes and severity of occupational injuries in construction workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77(1):60-66. doi:10.1007/s00420-003-0460-7.

  77. Wong AMK, Chou SW, Huang SC, Lan C, Chen HS, Hong WH, Chen CPC, Pei YC. Does different exercise have the same effect of health promotion for the elderly? Comparison of training-specific effect of tai chi and swimming on motor control. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;53(2):133-37. doi:10.1016/j. archger.2010.07.009.

  78. Chen W, Xiong C, Huang X, Sun R, Xiong Y. Kinematic analysis and dexterity evaluation of upper extremity in activities of daily living. Gait Posture. 2010;32(4):475-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gait- post.2010.07.005.

  79. Visser M, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevsky SB, Newman AB, Nevitt M, Rubin SM, Simonsick EM, Harris TB. Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle fat infiltration as predictors of incident mobility limitations in well-functioning older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(3):324-33. doi:10.1093/gerona/60.3.324.

  80. Milner TE. Adaptation to destabilizing dynamics by means of muscle cocontraction. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143(4):406-16. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1001-4.

  81. Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. 1954. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992;121(3):262-69. doi:10.1037/h0055392.

  82. Bootsma RJ, Fernandez L, Mottet D. Behind fitts' law: Kinematic patterns in goal-directed movements. Int J Hum-Comput St. 2004;61(6):811-21. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.004.

  83. Rumiati RI, Tessari A. Imitation of novel and well-known actions: The role of short-term memory. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 142(3):425-33. doi:10.1007/s00221-001-0956-x.

  84. Colombo R, Sterpi I, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Pisano F. Taking a lesson from patients' recovery strategies to optimize training during robot-aided rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012;20(3):276-85. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2195679.

  85. Jaspers E, Desloovere K, Bruyninckx H, Klingels K, Molenaers G, Aertbelien E, Gestel LV, Feys H. Three-dimensional upper limb movement characteristics in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and typically developing children. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(6):2283-94. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.038.

  86. Zariffa J, Kapadia N, Kramer JLK, Taylor P, Alizadeh-Meghrazi M, Zivanovic V, Albisser U, Wilms R, Townson A, Curt A, Popovic MR, Senior Member, IEEE, Steeves JD. Relationship between clinical assessments of function and measurements from an upper-limb robotic rehabilitation device in cervical spinal cord injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012;20(3):341-50. doi:10.1109/ TNSRE.2011.2181537.


Articles with similar content:

Rehabilitation of Neuropathies
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.19, 2007, issue 1
Wolfgang Grisold, Udo Zifko, Andrea Vass, Robert Schmidhammer
Treatment of Pediatric Overweight and Obesity: Assessing the Options
Critical Reviews™ in Oncogenesis, Vol.24, 2019, issue 3
Nahid Ranjbar, Cheryl A. Hall, Ashley Kurien
Factors Affecting Functional Recovery After Hip Fracture in the Elderly
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.16, 2004, issue 3
Marco Di Monaco
Directions in Retraining Reaching
Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol.13, 2001, issue 4
Paulette M. van Vliet, Ailie Turton
The Risk Factors of Head and Neck Cancer and Their General Patterns in Australia: A Descriptive Review and Update
Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, Vol.33, 2014, issue 1
Mahiban Thomas, Siddhartha Baxi, Rama` Jayaraj, Jagtar Singh, Ramya Ramamoorthi