Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research
ESCI SJR: 0.206 SNIP: 0.446 CiteScore™: 0.5

ISSN Druckformat: 2152-5102
ISSN Online: 2152-5110

Volumes:
Volumen 46, 2019 Volumen 45, 2018 Volumen 44, 2017 Volumen 43, 2016 Volumen 42, 2015 Volumen 41, 2014 Volumen 40, 2013 Volumen 39, 2012 Volumen 38, 2011 Volumen 37, 2010 Volumen 36, 2009 Volumen 35, 2008 Volumen 34, 2007 Volumen 33, 2006 Volumen 32, 2005 Volumen 31, 2004 Volumen 30, 2003 Volumen 29, 2002 Volumen 28, 2001 Volumen 27, 2000 Volumen 26, 1999 Volumen 25, 1998 Volumen 24, 1997 Volumen 23, 1996 Volumen 22, 1995

International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research

DOI: 10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.2018019615
pages 105-128

PRESSURE LOSSES FOR TURBULENT FLOW THROUGH BENDS IN SERIES

Blake T. Petersen
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
John M. Gorman
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
Eph M. Sparrow
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

ABSTRAKT

The pressure loss caused by a single isolated bend, which receives a fully developed flow and allows the flow to return to a fully developed state in its downstream tangent, is well documented and understood. However, when two or more bends are separated by a length insufficient to restore fully developed flow, the truncation of the pressure loss occurring downstream of the first bend and the distorted flow received by the second bend prevent the extrapolated use of singlebend data for the two-bend case. Using numerical simulation, a comprehensive investigation of the pressure losses caused by two-bend combinations was performed. Two in-plane bend combinations, having a "U" and "S" shape, and an out-of-plane bend combination were examined. For each bend combination, simulations were performed for many separating lengths ranging from zero to 100 pipe diameters for Reynolds numbers of 2·105, 5·104, and 1·104. For the "U" combination, the two-bend pressure loss decreased monotonically as the separating distance decreased. For the "S" and out-of-plane configurations, the pressure loss was at a minimum when the separating length was between three and five pipe diameters. This is consistent with the existing results from the highest quality experiments on the topic. In addition to results, the present work presents a fundamentals-based comprehensive explanation of the observed pressure loss trends using dimensionless quantities to measure the distortion of the flow at cross sections within the bend combination.


Articles with similar content:

REDUCING THE EFFECTS OF COlliNEARITY IN REGRESSION OF HEAT TRANSFER DATA
International Heat Transfer Conference 11, Vol.9, 1998, issue
Neima Brauner, Mordechai Shacham
The Effect of Manifold Cross-Flow on the Discharge Coefficient of Sharp-Edged Orifices
International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research, Vol.24, 1997, issue 1-3
K. M. Olson, Douglas Talley, P. A. Strakey
Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop During Evaporation and Condensation of R22 inside 9.52-mm O.D. Microfin Tubes of Different Geometries
Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, Vol.5, 1998, issue 1
Alfonso Niro, S. Arosio, Adriano Muzzio
THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF FURTHER CROSS-INCLINED IN-LINE AND STAGGERED TUBE BANKS
International Heat Transfer Conference 6, Vol.4, 1978, issue
J.L. King, E. M. Smith
A REVIEW ON HEAT TRANSFER AND PRESSURE DROP DURING EVAPORATION AND CONDENSATION OF R22 INSIDE 9.52-MM O.D. MICROFIN TUBES OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRIES
Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, Vol.24, 2017, issue 1-6
Alfonso Niro, S. Arosio, Adriano Muzzio