Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Atomization and Sprays
Impact-faktor: 1.737 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Druckformat: 1044-5110
ISSN Online: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volumen 30, 2020 Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2019026846
pages 975-999

EFFECTS OF MACH NUMBER ON LIQUID JET PRIMARY BREAKUP IN GAS CROSSFLOW

Feng Xiao
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, HuNan, 410073, China
M. B. Sun
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, HuNan, 410073, China

ABSTRAKT

Effects of Mach number on the primary breakup of liquid jet in high-speed gas crossflow are numerically investigated. In the applied methodology, the interface movement is directly tracked by a coupled level set and volume of fluid method. The liquid region is solved using an incompressible flow solver, and the gas flow is simulated using a compressible flow solver, with the two solvers coupled at the interface by specifying proper boundary conditions there. The primary breakup processes of liquid jet in both subsonic and supersonic crossflows are simulated at the same Weber number and liquid/gas momentum flux ratio. Different breakup morphologies are numerically predicted at different Mach numbers. The breakup initiation time and the wavelength of surface waves on the liquid column upstream side increase as the Mach number grows. It is observed that gas compressibility results in different pressure distributions around the liquid column at different Mach numbers. The lowest-pressure region at the liquid column periphery makes the liquid column deform faster in subsonic crossflow than in supersonic crossflow. As the Mach number of the crossflow increases, the liquid column penetrates higher in the near-nozzle region while showing a lower spray penetration in the farther-downstream region.


Articles with similar content:

STUDY ON BUBBLE BREAKUP BEHAVIOR IN A VENTURI TUBE
Multiphase Science and Technology, Vol.24, 2012, issue 3
Shin-Ichiro Uesawa, Yasumichi Nomura, Yutaka Abe, Akiko Kaneko
MODEL OF THE FUEL JET PRIMARY ATOMIZATION AND AERODYNAMICS OF SPRAY FORMATION AT HIGH-PRESSURE INJECTION IN A DIESEL ENGINE
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.28, 2018, issue 3
Oleksandr G. Girin
NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF MULTIPHASE FLOW INSIDE A PRESSURE SWIRL ATOMIZER AT THE INITIAL STAGE OF INJECTION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.28, 2018, issue 5
Alireza Razeghi, Özgür Ertunç
THE CHARACTERISTICS OF POSTIMPINGEMENT DIESEL SPRAY, PART II: EMPIRICAL EQUATION OF PENETRATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.12, 2002, issue 4
Masataka Arai, Kyungnam Ko
DROPLET STREAM DYNAMICS AT HIGH AMBIENT PRESSURE
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.6, 1996, issue 4
C. S. Connon, Derek Dunn-Rankin