Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Atomization and Sprays

Erscheint 12 Ausgaben pro Jahr

ISSN Druckformat: 1044-5110

ISSN Online: 1936-2684

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) IF: 1.2 To calculate the five year Impact Factor, citations are counted in 2017 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) 5-Year IF: 1.8 The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Immediacy Index: 0.3 The Eigenfactor score, developed by Jevin West and Carl Bergstrom at the University of Washington, is a rating of the total importance of a scientific journal. Journals are rated according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. Eigenfactor: 0.00095 The Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) is a single measurement of the field-normalized citation impact of journals in the Web of Science Core Collection across disciplines. The key words here are that the metric is normalized and cross-disciplinary. JCI: 0.28 SJR: 0.341 SNIP: 0.536 CiteScore™:: 1.9 H-Index: 57

Indexed in

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF LIQUID JET ATOMIZATION

Volumen 21, Ausgabe 9, 2011, pp. 711-736
DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2012003740
Get accessGet access

ABSTRAKT

In the past decade, numerical methods for two-phase flows, which are now capable of fully describing both phases and the interface, have progressed to a state of maturity. At present, direct numerical simulations (DNS) are possible even for complex configurations such as atomization processes. However, the numerical resources necessary to completely compute the atomization up to the formation of the final spray are still out of reach. Therefore, the large eddy simulation (LES) approach is very appealing for two-phase flows. Depending on the assumption concerning the relative size of the LES filter compared to the characteristic scale of interface wrinkles, two classes of LES methods have emerged: the first class of LES method is required close to the injector while the second class is needed far from the injector when the spray is formed. The present work describes a modeling proposal that solves this problem by focusing on the transition between these two classes of method for LES of two-phase flows. A postulated transport equation of the surface density is used to describe the subgrid spray formation ranging from interface wrinkling, ligaments, and sheets up to the droplets. Issued from Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) formalisms, this transport equation extends the usual spherical geometry given to the liquid structures that compose the subgrid spray. This equation contains several source terms that act on the creation and destruction of the liquid/gas interface. Considering that major breakup processes are due to turbulence in the field near the injector, an appropriate source term is proposed. This source term, also derived from RANS models, introduces a local critical value of surface density related to a critical Weber number that provides information concerning the local equilibrium between turbulent kinetic energy and surface energy. Concerning the velocity field, a standard Smagorinsky approach is considered. The initial results, obtained through the simulation of the atomization of a liquid jet, confirm that the subgrid term of the liquid volume fraction transport equation determines the transition between the resolved interface and the subgrid spray. An LES model for continuous two-phase flows, termed CLES in this paper, is proposed. The CLES model allows for a better description of the liquid dispersion within the calculation domain from both qualitative and quantitative points of view when compared with the usual LES formalism that does not consider subgrid terms for the interfacial contribution. Mean liquid volume fraction profiles are well captured with CLES when compared to "a posteriori" DNS simulations, and only a weak grid dependency is observed. Grid dependency is generally a major drawback when carrying out LES of interfacial flows. The surface density and behavior are well estimated and described by using a dedicated transport equation. Based on this parameter and thanks to a good estimation of the critical Weber number value, relevant characteristic scales of the subgrid spray in the atomization regime can be obtained.

REFERENZIERT VON
  1. Duret B., Reveillon J., Menard T., Demoulin F.X., Improving primary atomization modeling through DNS of two-phase flows, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 55, 2013. Crossref

  2. Navarro-Martinez S., Large eddy simulation of spray atomization with a probability density function method, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 63, 2014. Crossref

  3. Xue Q., Battistoni M., Powell C.F., Longman D.E., Quan S.P., Pomraning E., Senecal P.K., Schmidt D.P., Som S., An Eulerian CFD model and X-ray radiography for coupled nozzle flow and spray in internal combustion engines, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 70, 2015. Crossref

  4. Ling Y., Zaleski S., Scardovelli R., Multiscale simulation of atomization with small droplets represented by a Lagrangian point-particle model, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 76, 2015. Crossref

  5. Li Xiaoyi, Soteriou Marios C., High fidelity simulation and analysis of liquid jet atomization in a gaseous crossflow at intermediate Weber numbers, Physics of Fluids, 28, 8, 2016. Crossref

  6. Zandian Arash, Sirignano William A., Hussain Fazle, Three-dimensional liquid sheet breakup: vorticity dynamics, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016. Crossref

  7. Masri A. R., Turbulent Combustion of Sprays: From Dilute to Dense, Combustion Science and Technology, 188, 10, 2016. Crossref

  8. Salehi F., Cleary M. J., Masri A. R., Population balance equation for turbulent polydispersed inertial droplets and particles, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 831, 2017. Crossref

  9. Saeedipour Mahdi, Schneiderbauer Simon, Plohl Gregor, Brenn Günter, Pirker Stefan, Multiscale simulations and experiments on water jet atomization, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 95, 2017. Crossref

  10. Leung Timothy F., Groth Clinton P., Hu John, Evaluation of an Eulerian-Lagrangian Spray Atomization (ELSA) Model for Nozzle Flow: Modeling of Coupling Between Dense and Disperse Regions, 47th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, 2017. Crossref

  11. Saeedipour Mahdi, Vincent Stéphane, Pirker Stefan, Large eddy simulation of turbulent interfacial flows using Approximate Deconvolution Model, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 112, 2019. Crossref

  12. Canu Romain, Puggelli Stefano, Essadki Mohamed, Duret Benjamin, Menard Thibaut, Massot Marc, Reveillon Julien, Demoulin F.X., Where does the droplet size distribution come from?, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 107, 2018. Crossref

  13. Pakseresht Pedram, Apte Sourabh V., Volumetric displacement effects in Euler-Lagrange LES of particle-laden jet flows, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 113, 2019. Crossref

  14. Anez J., Ahmed A., Hecht N., Duret B., Reveillon J., Demoulin F.X., Eulerian–Lagrangian spray atomization model coupled with interface capturing method for diesel injectors, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 113, 2019. Crossref

  15. Ketterl S., Klein M., A-priori assessment of subgrid scale models for large-eddy simulation of multiphase primary breakup, Computers & Fluids, 165, 2018. Crossref

  16. Lakehal Djamel, Status and future developments of Large-Eddy Simulation of turbulent multi-fluid flows (LEIS and LESS), International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 104, 2018. Crossref

  17. GS Sidharth, Candler Graham V., Subgrid-scale effects in compressible variable-density decaying turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 846, 2018. Crossref

  18. Zandian Arash, Sirignano William A., Hussain Fazle, Length-scale cascade and spread rate of atomizing planar liquid jets, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 113, 2019. Crossref

  19. Navarro-Martinez Salvador, Tretola Giovanni, Yosri Mohammad Reza, Gordon Robert L, Vogiatzaki Konstantina, An investigation on the impact of small-scale models in gasoline direct injection sprays (ECN Spray G), International Journal of Engine Research, 21, 1, 2020. Crossref

  20. Murrone A., Le Touze C., Eulerian coupling of two-phase flow models for the large eddy simulation of the atomization in cryogenic combustion chamber, Progress in Propulsion Physics – Volume 11, 2019. Crossref

  21. Pandal Adrian, Garcia-Oliver Jose M, Pastor Jose M, Eulerian CFD modeling of nozzle geometry effects on ECN Sprays A and D: assessment and analysis, International Journal of Engine Research, 21, 1, 2020. Crossref

  22. Duret B., Menard T., Reveillon J., Demoulin F. X., Potential of Two-Phase Flows DNS to Characterize Interactions between Turbulence and Widely Deformed Interface, in Turbulence and Interactions, 125, 2014. Crossref

  23. Le Touze C., Dorey L.-H., Rutard N., Murrone A., A compressible two-phase flow framework for Large Eddy Simulations of liquid-propellant rocket engines, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 84, 2020. Crossref

  24. Nykteri Georgia, Koukouvinis Phoevos, Gonzalez Avila Silvestre Roberto, Ohl Claus-Dieter, Gavaises Manolis, A Σ-ϒ two-fluid model with dynamic local topology detection: Application to high-speed droplet impact, Journal of Computational Physics, 408, 2020. Crossref

  25. Pandal Adrian, Rahantamialisoa Faniry, Ningegowda B M, Battistoni Michele, An Enhanced Σ-Y Spray Atomization Model Accounting for Diffusion due to Drift-Flux Velocities, SAE Technical Paper Series, 1, 2020. Crossref

  26. Lehmkuhl O., Mira D., Gasparino L., Owen H., Houzeaux G., Large-Eddy Simulation of Primary Atomization Using an Entropy Stable Conservative Level Set, in Direct and Large Eddy Simulation XII, 27, 2020. Crossref

  27. Gonzalez-Juez Esteban D., Kerstein Alan R., Multiscale modeling of turbulent atomization: Droplet-size sampling, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 128, 2020. Crossref

  28. Chávez-Modena M., Rubio G., Valero E., Mira D., Lehmkuhl O., Multi-physics methodology for phase change due to rapidly depressurised two-phase flows, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 144, 2021. Crossref

  29. Wang B., Cleary M. J., Masri A. R., Modeling of interfacial flows based on an explicit volume diffusion concept, Physics of Fluids, 33, 6, 2021. Crossref

  30. Abbas F., Wang B., Cleary M. J., Masri A. R., Numerical convergence of volume of fluid based large eddy simulations of atomizing sprays, Physics of Fluids, 33, 4, 2021. Crossref

  31. Lyras Panagiotis, Hubert Antoine, Lyras Konstantinos G., A conservative level set method for liquid-gas flows with application in liquid jet atomisation, Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2021. Crossref

  32. Tretola G., Vogiatzaki K., Navarro-Martinez S., Implementation of a probabilistic surface density volume of fluid approach for spray atomisation, Computers & Fluids, 230, 2021. Crossref

  33. Loureiro D.D., Kronenburg A., Reutzsch J., Weigand B., Vogiatzaki K., Droplet size distributions in cryogenic flash atomization, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 142, 2021. Crossref

  34. Xiong Pei, He Shihao, Qiu Facheng, Cheng Zhiliang, Quan Xuejun, Zhang Xingran, Li Wensheng, Experimental and mathematical study on jet atomization and flash evaporation characteristics of droplets in a depressurized environment, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 123, 2021. Crossref

  35. Tretola Giovanni, Vogiatzaki Konstantina, Navarro-Martinez Salvador, Effect of the density ratio variation on the dynamics of a liquid jet injected into a gaseous cross-flow, Physics of Fluids, 33, 9, 2021. Crossref

  36. Nykteri Georgia, Gavaises Manolis, Droplet aerobreakup under the shear-induced entrainment regime using a multiscale two-fluid approach, Physical Review Fluids, 6, 8, 2021. Crossref

  37. Ketterl S., Reißmann M., Klein Markus, Large eddy simulation of multiphase flows using the volume of fluid method: Part 2—A-posteriori analysis of liquid jet atomization, Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 1, 3, 2019. Crossref

  38. Amatriain Aitor, Urionabarrenetxea Ernesto, Avello Alejo, Martín José Manuel, Multiphase model to predict particle size distributions in close-coupled gas atomization, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 154, 2022. Crossref

  39. Desantes J.M., García-Oliver J.M., Pastor J.M., Olmeda I., Pandal A., Naud B., LES Eulerian diffuse-interface modeling of fuel dense sprays near- and far-field, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 127, 2020. Crossref

  40. Klein Markus, Ketterl S., Hasslberger J., Large eddy simulation of multiphase flows using the volume of fluid method: Part 1—Governing equations and a priori analysis, Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 1, 2, 2019. Crossref

  41. Nykteri Georgia, Gavaises Manolis, Numerical modeling of droplet rim fragmentation by laser-pulse impact using a multiscale two-fluid approach, Physical Review Fluids, 7, 10, 2022. Crossref

Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen Preise und Aborichtlinien Begell House Kontakt Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain