Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Atomization and Sprays
Impact-faktor: 1.737 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN Druckformat: 1044-5110
ISSN Online: 1936-2684

Volumes:
Volumen 30, 2020 Volumen 29, 2019 Volumen 28, 2018 Volumen 27, 2017 Volumen 26, 2016 Volumen 25, 2015 Volumen 24, 2014 Volumen 23, 2013 Volumen 22, 2012 Volumen 21, 2011 Volumen 20, 2010 Volumen 19, 2009 Volumen 18, 2008 Volumen 17, 2007 Volumen 16, 2006 Volumen 15, 2005 Volumen 14, 2004 Volumen 13, 2003 Volumen 12, 2002 Volumen 11, 2001 Volumen 10, 2000 Volumen 9, 1999 Volumen 8, 1998 Volumen 7, 1997 Volumen 6, 1996 Volumen 5, 1995 Volumen 4, 1994 Volumen 3, 1993 Volumen 2, 1992 Volumen 1, 1991

Atomization and Sprays

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v5.i3.40
pages 305-328

MEASUREMENTS OF u′gi u′pi IN MIXING-LAYER FLOW WITH DROPLET LOADING

Muh-Rong Wang
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China
D. Y. Huang
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China

ABSTRAKT

Measurements of the turbulence modulation term, u′gi u′pi, between the carrier and dispersed phases from experimental data were performed by a phase Doppler particle analyzer (PDPA) system. The cross-correlation function between phases, u′gi(t) u′pi(t + τ), was first determined from the measured raw data, which involved real-time information about velocities and associated drop sizes. The time delay, τ, was selected based on the flow characteristic time. The velocity of 2-μm drops was taken as that of the carrier phase. The cross-correlation functions for 10-μm, 20-μm, and 30-μm drops were then calculated from the raw data for each size range. The value of the cross-correlation function at τ = 0, that is, the turbulence modulation term, was obtained based on the symmetric property of this function and interpolation of the data. Results show that the turbulence modulation term can be expressed as functions of drop relaxation time, τp, turbulence kinetic energies of both phases, κ and κp, Reynolds stress u′g v′g, and velocity correlation of the drop phase, u′p v′p, instead of the formulation suggested by Pourahmadi and Humphrey [5] as well as by Chen and Wood [3, 4], which considered τp and κ only. It is suggested that the modeling of spray flow requires a more complete formulation based on the experimental data shown in this article.


Articles with similar content:

MODELING THE INITIAL DROPLET SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN SPRAYS BASED ON THE MAXIMIZATION OF ENTROPY GENERATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.15, 2005, issue 3
Huijuan Fu, Xianguo Li, Meishen Li
SPRAY FORMATION BY FLASHING OF A BINARY MIXTURE: A PARAMETRIC STUDY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.8, 1998, issue 3
Eran Sher, Michal Zeigerson-Katz
MODELING OF COLLISIONAL SURFACE PRODUCTION/DESTRUCTION TERMS WITHIN THE Σ-Υ EULERIAN SPRAY ATOMIZATION MODEL
ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.0, 2017, issue
Reinhold Kneer, Dominik Eichler, Philipp Pischke
ATOMIZATION OF CROSS-INJECTING SPRAYS INTO CONVECTIVE AIR STREAM
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.5, 1995, issue 4&5
Kenneth D. Kihm, S. Y. Son, G. M. Lyn
SOME TESTS OF TWO-FLUID MODELS FOR TWO-PHASE FLOW
Dynamics of Two-Phase Flows, Vol.1, 1988, issue
Graham B. Wallis