Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen
Heat Transfer Research
Impact-faktor: 0.404 5-jähriger Impact-Faktor: 0.8 SJR: 0.264 SNIP: 0.504 CiteScore™: 0.88

ISSN Druckformat: 1064-2285
ISSN Online: 2162-6561

Volumes:
Volumen 51, 2020 Volumen 50, 2019 Volumen 49, 2018 Volumen 48, 2017 Volumen 47, 2016 Volumen 46, 2015 Volumen 45, 2014 Volumen 44, 2013 Volumen 43, 2012 Volumen 42, 2011 Volumen 41, 2010 Volumen 40, 2009 Volumen 39, 2008 Volumen 38, 2007 Volumen 37, 2006 Volumen 36, 2005 Volumen 35, 2004 Volumen 34, 2003 Volumen 33, 2002 Volumen 32, 2001 Volumen 31, 2000 Volumen 30, 1999 Volumen 29, 1998 Volumen 28, 1997

Heat Transfer Research

DOI: 10.1615/HeatTransRes.2016014017
pages 865-884

EVAPORATION HEAT LOSS IN THE FLAMELET MODEL FOR DILUTE SPRAY FLAMES

Jing Chen
Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Minming Zhu
Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Minghou Liu
Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, P.R. China
Yiliang Chen
Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, P.R. China

ABSTRAKT

The motivation of this paper is to extend the flamelet/progress variables (FPV) approach used successfully in gaseous flames to spray combustion. To consider the evaporation heat loss effect in the FPV approach, two new methods are proposed. One is to correct the gaseous temperature in the flamelet calculation, and the other is to couple this heat loss into the CFD process. To evaluate their performance, the piloted ethanol-air spray flames are simulated by LES in the Eulerian-Lagrangian framework. The simulation results using these two methods and some other existing models are compared with experimental data. It is shown that both methods give lower gaseous temperature compared to the conventional FPV approach and the mean gaseous temperature is closer to the experimental data especially downstream and near the centerline. As to other statistical results (e.g., the mean velocities and rms velocities and SMD), these methods show similar profiles which are all in good agreement with experimental data. The conclusion is that our models can give a good account of the evaporation heat loss. Meanwhile, much lower computational costs are needed compared to the method of solving the enthalpy equation.


Articles with similar content:

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON A HOT JET IN CROSS FLOW USING SCALE-RESOLVING SIMULATIONS
TSFP DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE, Vol.7, 2011, issue
Herve Bezard, Sebastien Deck, Florian R. Menter, Thorsten Hansen, Benjamin M. Duda, Marie-Josephe Esteve
On the Formalization of Dynamics in Information Processes on the Basis of Inhomogeneous One-Dimensional Diffusion Models
Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol.51, 2019, issue 2
Elena V. Gavrylenko , Evgeniy V. Ivokhin , Larisa T. Adzhubey
BAYESIAN NONPARAMETRIC GENERAL REGRESSION
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol.6, 2016, issue 3
Gilberto A. Ortiz, Ka Veng Yuen
ASSESSMENT OF DROPLET BREAKUP MODELS IN HIGH-SPEED CROSS-FLOW
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.27, 2017, issue 1
Debasis Chakraborty, P. Manna, Anand Bhandarkar
COMPUTED AND MEASURED FUEL VAPOR DISTRIBUTION IN A DIESEL SPRAY
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.20, 2010, issue 3
Lyle M. Pickett, John P. Abraham