Abo Bibliothek: Guest
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

Erscheint 4 Ausgaben pro Jahr

ISSN Druckformat: 1050-6934

ISSN Online: 1940-4379

SJR: 0.184 SNIP: 0.485 CiteScore™:: 1.1 H-Index: 39

Indexed in

Abstract of "Ethical Safeguards for Industry-Funded Research in an Academic Setting

Volumen 18, Ausgabe 1, 2008, 11 pages
DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v18.i1.90
Get accessGet access

ABSTRAKT

Investigators are increasingly faced with public scrutiny on the manner in which they fund and report their research into new materials and appliances for patient care. This is particularly important in academic centers where there are four stakeholders, namely, the investigator, the institution, patients, and industry. This is a report on the elements of how one institution provides support to an investigator. This process makes it possible for the investigator to concentrate on research methodology and be secure about the ethical nature of their research. At Henry Ford, all industrial-funded research is arranged on an institution-to-sponsor basis. Although investigators are the most common resource for initial contact from industry, the investigator can immediately hand over to the institution materials for the formulation of contracts and IRB proposals. The following steps occur in parallel. Contract language is generated by the institution, not the investigator. This protects the investigator (utilization of data for research purposes, freedom to publish regardless of the results, and intellectual property), patient protection (HIPAA privacy laws, subject injury coverage, and IRB approval) and the institution (intellectual property, compliance with the federal/state guidelines, and indemnification). Concurrently, IRB proposals are prepared and submitted. To insure that all steps meet ethical standards, investigators and their departmental chairs are required to complete and sign a document called the preaward and postaward authorization form. This form has multiple purposes. It insures that there are no conflicts of interest, cost sharing is defined if applicable, IRB approval is obtained, and that the departmental chair supports the proposal. The document also collects information that is entered into a database that tracks institutional, investigator, and sponsor project data and captures research funding. The investigator, with the knowledge of the conduct of the study, formulates the budget to ensure that the actual costs for equipment, supplies, and personnel effort are captured. All contractual negations take place in the central Research Administration office, and do not involve the investigator. This frees the investigator for other details of the proposal and research methodology. This process provides a transparency acceptable to all stakeholders.

Zukünftige Artikel

Transfer of guided emergence profile developed using customized provisional implant restoration and cementation using an abutment replica technique- A case report. Vinay Sivaswamy, Balaji Anand S D, Jacob Mathew Philip, C J Venkatakrishnan, Narasimman M, Helen Mary Abraham, Pavithra B Marijuana use is Associated with Increased Rates of Hip Dislocation and Lower Insurance Reimbursement among THA Recipients Andrew Recker, Chukwuweike Gwam, Erin Kelly, Scott Douglas, Johannes Plate Surface modification of Mg alloy AZ91D using nanopowder mixed EDM for Biodegradable Implant Alok Kumar, Abhishek Singh The history of orthopedics in the long term: from general medicine to medical specialties Pavlos Altsitzioglou, Ioannis Zafeiris, Fotini Soucacos, Pantelis Limneos, Eleftheria Souliotis, Evanthia Mitsiokapa, Theodosis Saranteas, Andreas Mavrogenis COMPARISON OF ROUGHNESS, WETTABILITY AND SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY FEATURES BETWEEN SANDBLASTED ACID-ETCHED AND OXIDIZED TITANIUM DENTAL IMPLANTS Kshitiz Chhabra, Arvina Rajasekar CORRELATION BETWEEN PRIMARY STABILITY OF DENTAL IMPLANTS AND BONE DENSITY: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS Padmaja S, Arvina Rajasekar C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rates after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - less implant equals quicker normalization Kasım Kılıçarslan, Ömer Faruk Naldöven, Enejd Veizi, Şahan Güven, Şahin Çepni, Ahmet Fırat COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING SHORT FEMORAL NAIL FIXATION FOR INTETROCHANTERIC HIP FRACTURES. A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Anastasia Vasilopoulou, Antonios Trichonas, Konstantinos Palaiologos, Emmanouel Antonogiannakis, Christos Nikakis, Stavros Angelis, Spyridon Maris, Christos Grekas , Efthimios Karadimas, Alexandros Apostolopoulos FEA: Connector Designs and Pontic Stress Distribution of Fixed Partial Denture Implant-Supported Metal Framework Saja Muhsin, Enas Mohammed, Khalid Bander Design and Frequency Stability Analysis of an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System based Artificial Pacemaker Controller in MATLAB Nader Jafarnia Dabanloo, Asghar Dabiriaghdam, Fereidoon Nooshirvan Rahatabad, Keivan Maghooli Complications following intraosseous injections of calcium phosphate bone cement in Subchondroplasty. Christos Zachariadis, Helen Leligou, Stauros Kourkoulis, Evaggelos Magnisalis, Panayiotis Papagelopoulos, Olga Savvidou The Impact of Patient Characteristics on Outcomes of Surgically Managed Vertebral Osteomyelitis in the United States: Insights from a National Database Study Jennifer Kurowicki, Stuart Changoor, Daniel Coban, Neil Patel, Kumar Sinha, Ki Hwang, Arash Emami ASSOCIATION OF AGE, GENDER AND SITE OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT - AN INSTITUTION BASED RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Harini Sri, Nabeel Ahmed, Keerthi Shasanka
Digitales Portal Digitale Bibliothek eBooks Zeitschriften Referenzen und Berichte Forschungssammlungen Preise und Aborichtlinien Begell House Kontakt Language English 中文 Русский Português German French Spain