图书馆订阅: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell 数字图书馆 电子图书 期刊 参考文献及会议录 研究收集
雾化与喷雾
影响因子: 1.737 5年影响因子: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN 打印: 1044-5110
ISSN 在线: 1936-2684

卷:
卷 30, 2020 卷 29, 2019 卷 28, 2018 卷 27, 2017 卷 26, 2016 卷 25, 2015 卷 24, 2014 卷 23, 2013 卷 22, 2012 卷 21, 2011 卷 20, 2010 卷 19, 2009 卷 18, 2008 卷 17, 2007 卷 16, 2006 卷 15, 2005 卷 14, 2004 卷 13, 2003 卷 12, 2002 卷 11, 2001 卷 10, 2000 卷 9, 1999 卷 8, 1998 卷 7, 1997 卷 6, 1996 卷 5, 1995 卷 4, 1994 卷 3, 1993 卷 2, 1992 卷 1, 1991

雾化与喷雾

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2013007342
pages 419-442

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF HIGH-VELOCITY FUEL SPRAYS: STUDYING MESH RESOLUTION AND BREAKUP MODEL EFFECTS FOR SPRAY A

Armin Wehrfritz
UNSW Australia
Ville Vuorinen
Aalto University, School of Engineering, TKK, Internal Combustion Engine Research Group, Department of Energy Technology, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Ossi Kaario
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland
Martti Larmi
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland

ABSTRACT

Large eddy simulation (LES) of the nonreacting Spray A target conditions, as defined by the Engine Combustion Network, are carried out and compared to high-quality, experimental validation data. The investigated test case is characterized by a high injection pressure, small nozzle hole diameter, and inert ambient gas conditions at high-temperature and high-pressure. In the present study, implicit LES is used together with the Lagrangian particle tracking approach for the liquid phase to (i) investigate the effect of mesh resolution and (ii) study the influence of droplet breakup modeling on the local and global flow characteristics. Two breakup models are compared at four different mesh resolutions. The results are quantitatively analyzed with respect to integral spray quantities and validated against the experimental data. Qualitative characterization of the local velocities and mixture formation is presented. A good agreement of simulated and measured liquid/vapor penetration is achieved for both breakup models, given a sufficient mesh resolution. However, local differences in droplet diameter and vapor mass are observed between the breakup models in the nozzle vicinity. The overall mixture formation shows little dependency on the breakup modeling approach yet a strong dependency on the mesh resolution.


Articles with similar content:

VALIDATION OF THE VSB2 SPRAY MODEL AGAINST SPRAY A AND SPRAY H
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.26, 2016, issue 8
Anne Kosters, A. Karlsson
EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF SPRAY DISPERSION AND EVAPORATION IN A COMBUSTION CHAMBER
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 10
Andreas Dreizler, Johannes Janicka, Amsini Sadiki, M. Hage, Mouldi Chrigui
ASSESSMENT OF ATOMIZATION MODELS FOR DIESEL ENGINE SIMULATIONS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.19, 2009, issue 9
S. Som, Suresh Aggarwal
EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TURBULENT DISPERSION AND SPRAY BREAKUP MODELS ON THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF IN-CYLINDER FUEL SPRAY
Computational Thermal Sciences: An International Journal, Vol.5, 2013, issue 1
M. Mofarrahi, Reza Kamali
ONE-DIMENSIONAL DIESEL SPRAY MODELING OF MULTICOMPONENT FUELS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.25, 2015, issue 6
W. Vera-Tudela, Jose M. Pastor, Jose M. Garcia-Oliver, Jose V. Pastor