图书馆订阅: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell 数字图书馆 电子图书 期刊 参考文献及会议录 研究收集
雾化与喷雾
影响因子: 1.737 5年影响因子: 1.518 SJR: 0.814 SNIP: 1.18 CiteScore™: 2.2

ISSN 打印: 1044-5110
ISSN 在线: 1936-2684

卷:
卷 30, 2020 卷 29, 2019 卷 28, 2018 卷 27, 2017 卷 26, 2016 卷 25, 2015 卷 24, 2014 卷 23, 2013 卷 22, 2012 卷 21, 2011 卷 20, 2010 卷 19, 2009 卷 18, 2008 卷 17, 2007 卷 16, 2006 卷 15, 2005 卷 14, 2004 卷 13, 2003 卷 12, 2002 卷 11, 2001 卷 10, 2000 卷 9, 1999 卷 8, 1998 卷 7, 1997 卷 6, 1996 卷 5, 1995 卷 4, 1994 卷 3, 1993 卷 2, 1992 卷 1, 1991

雾化与喷雾

DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v19.i12.50
pages 1147-1169

PLANAR LIQUID SHEET BREAKUP OF PREFILMING AND NONPREFILMING ATOMIZERS AT ELEVATED PRESSURES

Umesh Bhayaraju
Institute of Propulsion Technology, German Aerospace Centre, Linder Höhe, 51147 Cologne
Christoph Hassa
German Aerospace Center−DLR, Institute of Propulsion Technology, Linder Hohe, 51147 Cologne, Germany

ABSTRACT

Liquid sheet breakup of a prefilming and nonprefilming airblast atomizer is investigated experimentally at ambient temperatures and elevated pressures of air. The breakup is studied by high-speed flow visualization. The visualizations show the differences between both types of atomizers. For lower liquid loadings, the atomizer edge is always wetted in the prefilming case, whereas dry zones are observed for the nonprefilming injector. Different atomization regimes are observed for rising Weber numbers on the prefilmer: wavy sheet breakup below We = 100, surface stripping above 380, and a transition zone in between. The nonprefilming case always exhibits wavy sheet breakup, provided there is a sheet at the outlet, with the breakup length reducing to 0.5 mm above We 100. Liquid sheet thickness is characterized with side view images. Films that are thin compared to the edge thickness and are not composed of ligaments at the edge, wrap around the edge and therefore exhibit a storage mechanism. In the far field, drop sizes are characterized with a global Sauter mean diameter measured by phase Doppler anemometry. The measured drop sizes, influenced by primary and secondary atomization, show only small differences between the two types of atomizers. Correlations for the final drop size are obtained for both atomizer types for the conditions investigated.


Articles with similar content:

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF COALESCENCE AND DROPLET TRAJECTORIES BETWEEN TWO POLYDISPERSE SPRAYS
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.16, 2006, issue 3
M. Valencia-Bejarano, J. J. Nijdam, Timothy Langrish
SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT FOR COMPARISON OF DROPLET SIZES MEASURED BY FREEZING METHOD WITH THOSE BY LASER LIGHT SCATTER DETECTION METHODS
ICLASS 94
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Vol.0, 1994, issue
Toshio Kurabayashi, T. Nagasaka, Siichi Shiga, K. Kawabata, Takao Karasawa
EFFECT OF TRANSVERSE ACOUSTIC FORCING ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF IMPINGING JET ATOMIZATION
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.29, 2019, issue 1
Hrishikesh Gadgil, Sandip Dighe
SPRAY FORMATION OF A HYDRAULIC FLAT FAN NOZZLE WITH AN INTERNALLY DISTURBED FLOW
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.8, 1998, issue 6
P. J. Walklate, N. H. Thomas, P. C. H. Miller, Q. Zhou
TWIN-FLUID ATOMIZATION: FACTORS INFLUENCING MEAN DROP SIZE
Atomization and Sprays, Vol.2, 1992, issue 2
Arthur H. Lefebvre