图书馆订阅: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell 数字图书馆 电子图书 期刊 参考文献及会议录 研究收集
国际不确定性的量化期刊
影响因子: 3.259 5年影响因子: 2.547 SJR: 0.417 SNIP: 0.8 CiteScore™: 1.52

ISSN 打印: 2152-5080
ISSN 在线: 2152-5099

Open Access

国际不确定性的量化期刊

DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018025120
pages 429-446

UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR INCIDENT HELIUM FLUX IN PLASMA-EXPOSED TUNGSTEN

Ozgur Cekmer
Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Khachik Sargsyan
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, USA
Sophie Blondel
Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
Habib N. Najm
Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 969, MS 9051, Livermore, CA 94551, USA
David E. Bernholdt
Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Brian D. Wirth
Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996; Nuclear Science and Engineering Directorate, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831

ABSTRACT

In this work, the surface response of a tungsten plasma-facing component was simulated by a cluster-dynamics code, Xolotl, with a focus on quantifying the impact of uncertainty in one of the input parameters to Xolotl, namely, the incident helium flux. The simulated conditions involve a tungsten surface exposed to 100 eV helium ion implantations with a flux of either 4 × 1022 or 4 × 1025 He m-2s-1. Two sources were used to describe the implanted helium depth distribution in tungsten, either molecular dynamics (MD) or a binary collision approximation code, the stopping and range of ions in matter (SRIM). The aim of this work is to evaluate and examine uncertain predictions on the helium retention based on these two different modeling methodologies that either neglect electronic energy loss or the crystalline structure of the solid, respectively. An embedded model-form error approach was pursued here in order to arrive at predictions that account for variability due to the two different data sources, and the impact of this model-form uncertainty in incident helium flux on Xolotl output was presented for the two implantation fluxes.