图书馆订阅: Guest
Begell Digital Portal Begell 数字图书馆 电子图书 期刊 参考文献及会议录 研究收集
器官移植长期效应期刊
SJR: 0.145 SNIP: 0.491 CiteScore™: 0.89

ISSN 打印: 1050-6934
ISSN 在线: 1940-4379

器官移植长期效应期刊

DOI: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2019030030
pages 37-43

Comparison of Stress Distribution in Alveolar Bone with Different Implant Diameters and Vertical Cantilever Length via the Finite Element Method

Ashraf Sayyedi
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mahsa Rashidpour
Deputy Dean of dental material laboratory, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Fayyaz
Prosthodontics Department, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Niloufar Ahmadian
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Dehghan
Department of Prosthdontics, Dental School, Shahid Behesti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Forouzan Faghani
Department of Prosthdontics, Dental School, Shahid Behesti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Paniz Fasih
Department of Prosthdontics, Dental School, Shahid Behesti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

ABSTRACT

Available bone is one of the important factors in implant treatments. Due to concerns about complications caused by less bone implant contact area, researchers have focused on biomechanical properties of implants and methods to promote them. We investigated stress distribution around bone of different implant diameters and vertical cantilever length. Computed tomography (CT) images obtained of human mandible were used in this study. An SPI implant (Alpha Bio Tech, Simplantology) of two different lengths (10.5 mm and 8.5 mm) and two different widths (3.5 mm and 4.5 mm) were placed into two different groups of bone samples (with and without osteoplasty). Vertical and lateral forces of 100N and 30N at 45° were applied simultaneously in two models. The stress was analyzed using the finite element method. Maximum stress areas were located around the implant neck. Lower stress values in the loaded implants were observed in the shorter group related to the increase in crown height space, when compared to the other group. A wider implant may be better to dissipate force, thus reducing stress on the bone surrounding the implant. Additionally, the use of shorter and wider implants might be a reasonable alternative in sites limited by the height of the residual ridge.

REFERENCES

  1. Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. , The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a threedimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:422–31.

  2. Brink J, Meraw SJ, Sarment DP. , Influence of implant diameter on surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):563–68.

  3. Van Rossen IP, Braak LH, De Putter C, De Groot K. , Stress absorbing elements in dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(2):198–205.

  4. Kong L, Sun Y, Hu K, Li D, Hou R, Yang J, Liu B. , Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodon. 2008;17(4):286–93.

  5. Georgiopoulos B, Kalioras K, Provatidis C, Manda M, Koidis P., The effects of implant length and diameter prior to and after osseointegration: a 2D finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33(5):243–56.

  6. Misch CE. , Contemporary implant dentistry, 3rd edition. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2008.

  7. Geramy A, Faghihi SH. , Secondary trauma from occlusion: 3D analysis using finite element method. Quintessence Intl. 2004;35:835–43.

  8. Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kilicarslan MA, Eskitascioglu G., Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;93(3):227–34.

  9. Menicucci G, Mossolov A, Mozzati M, Lorenzetti M, Preti G. , Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13(3):334–41.

  10. Witter DJ, De Haan AF, Kayser AF, Van Rossum GM. , A 6-year follow-up study of oral function in shortened dental arches. Part II: craniomandibular dysfunction and oral comfort. J Oral Rehabil.1994. 21(4):353–66.

  11. Huang YM, Chou IC, Jiang CP, Wu YS, Lee SY. , Finite element analysis of dental implant neck effects on primary stability and osseointegration in a type IV bone mandible. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(1):1407–15.

  12. Bechelli AH. , The osseointegrated prosthesis-combination of osseointegrated implants and natural teeth in fixed prosthesis. J Oral Implantol. 1992;18:62–65.

  13. McNeill C. , Science and practice of occlusion, 1st edition. Chicago: Quintessence; 1997.

  14. Geramy A. , Alveolar bone resorption and the center of resistance modification: 3D analysis by means of the F.E.M. Am J Orthodon Dentofac Orthoped. 2000;117: 399–405.

  15. Geramy A, Morgano S. , Finite element analysis of three designs of an implant supported molar crown. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:434–40.

  16. Geramy A. Sharafodding F. , Abfraction: 3D analysis using finite element method. Quintessence Intl. 2003;34:526–33.

  17. Esposito M. , Rehabilitation of posterior atrophic edentulous jaws. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4:21–30.

  18. Verri FR, Pellizzer EP, Rocha EP, Pereira JA. , Influence of length and diameter of implants associated with distal extension removable partial dentures. Implant Dent. 2007;16(3):270–80.

  19. Baiamonte T, Abbate MF, Pizzarello F, Lozada J, James R. , The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems. J Oral Implantol. 1996;22(2):104–10.

  20. Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. , Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(1):20–25.

  21. Kumar GA, Mahesh B, George D. , Three dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution around implant with straight and angled abutments in different bone qualities. J Indian Prosthodon Soc. 2013;13(4):466–72.

  22. Ure G, Barquins M, Chappard D. , Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002.17(3):353–62.


Articles with similar content:

Stress and Strain Distribution Patterns in Bone around Splinted Standard and Short Implants Placed at the Crestal Level and Subcrestally using Three- Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.27, 2017, issue 1
Raheleh Akhavan Rasoolzadeh, Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh, Amir Mahmoudi Motlagh, Farshad Dehnavi, Reza Amid
Correlative Experimental Animal and Human Clinical Retrieval Evaluations of Hydroxyapatite (HA)-Coated and Non-Coated Implants in Orthopaedics and Dentistry
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, Vol.28, 2000, issue 3&4
David E. Steflik, Raymond Y. Whitehead, Michael D. Wilson, Carlos Jaramillo, Timothy R. Young, R. Scott Corpe
Measurements of Surface and Subsurface Damage in Retrieved Polyethylene Tibial Inserts of a Contemporary Design
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.22, 2012, issue 1
Jan-M. Brandt, David W. Holdsworth, Matthew G Teeter, Eric R. Bohm, Douglas D. R. Naudie, Richard W. McCalden
Technique to Quantify Subsurface Cracks in Retrieved Polyethylene Components Using Micro-CT
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.20, 2010, issue 1
David W. Holdsworth, Matthew G Teeter, Xunhua Yuan, Douglas D. R. Naudie
Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection Type on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bone and Abutment Micromovement: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, Vol.29, 2019, issue 2
Fariborz Vafaee, Masoumeh Khoshhal, Narges Panahandeh, Parviz Torkzaban, Bahman Tootiaee, Narges Ziaei